APHC010963142018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] TUESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 46511/2018 Between: 1. B.VENKATA RAMANA, S/O.LATA TATA BABU AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, OCC. ADVOCATE R/O.LINGABHUPALAPATNAM, CHEEDIKADA MANDAL VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT - 531 028. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM RURAL VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CHEEDIKADA POLICE STATION VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4. POTHALA SURI DEMUDU, S/O.LATE RAMULU AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE R/O. LINGABHUPALAPATNAM, CHEEDIKADA MANDAL VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT - 531 028. 5. DURGA RAJYALAKSHMI, W/O.LATE KAMESHWAR RAO AGED 40 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE R/O.LINGABHUPALAPATNAM, CHEEDIKADA MANDAL VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT - 531 028. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in failing to register the complaint of the petitioner bearing Receipt No.63/2018, dt.12.05.2018 filed against the Respondents 4 and 5 as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of Cr.P.C., and consequently direct the respondents 2 and 3 to forthwith register the complaint of the petitioner under acknowledgement No.63/2018, dt.12.05.2018 and to initiate the consequential steps of investigation and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 and 3 to forthwith register the complaint of the petitioner under acknowledgement No.63/2018, dt.12.05.2018 and to take consequential steps, pending disposal of the Writ Petition, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. BANDARU JAGADEESWARI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.46511 OF 2018 ORDER: None appeared for the petitioner either physically or through video conference, though the matter is posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Earlier also, there was no representation for the petitioner. 2. Sri R.Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 3. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 18.11.2025 PSK 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 35 WRIT PETITION No:46511 OF 2018 Date: 18.11.2025 W PSK