T M ZAHEER AHMED S/O T M RAFEEQ AHMED v. KARNATAKA GRAMIN BANK
WP/103350/2021 · 2025-09-25
Suraj Govindaraj
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 53741 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 53741 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13285 WP No. 103350 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 103350 OF 2021 (S-RES) BETWEEN:
T M ZAHEER AHMED S/O T M RAFEEQ AHMED AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS,, R/O. H.NO.41, MALATHESHA NILAYA, JAWARI STREET, COWL BAZAR, BELLARI 583102. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. R. NAGENDRA NAIK, ADVOCATE)
AND:
KARNATAKA GRAMIN BANK HEAD OFFICE, NO.32, SANGANAKAL ROAD, GANDHINAGAR, BELLARY 583103.
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN. …RESPONDENT (BY SMT. POORNIMA S.A. ADVOCATE)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO, DECLARE THAT CUT-OFF DATE FIXED BY THE RESPONDENT BANK IN CIRCULAR NO 112/2019-20 IS ILLEGAL AND CONTRARY TO JUDGMENT OF SUPREME COURT AND ALSO THE SCHEME INTRODUCED IN THE NATIONAL COMMERCIAL BANKS. QUASH THE ENDORSEMENT DATED 03.04.2018 NUMBER HO.STF.TBS.1425.2018.19 AS PER ANNEXURE-B IN ILLEGAL AND ARBITRARY. TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, DIRECTION OR
Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13285 WP No. 103350 of 2021
ORDER DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO EXTEND THE BENEFIT OF 05.08.2014 BEARING CIRCULAR NO.CIR/HR AND IR/2014-15/532/476 SCHEME AND 24.04.2019 SCHEME BEARING CIRCULAR NO.112/2019-20 TO THE DEPENDENTS OF THE DECEASED EMPLOYEES WHO DIED DURING THE PERIOD BETWEEN 2009-2019 AND TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, DIRECTION OR ORDER COMMANDING THE RESPONDENT TO APPOINT PETITIONER IN THE RESPONDENT BANK UNDER THE SCHEME FOR COMPASSIONATE APPOINTMENT.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ)
1. Despite the order dated 12.09.2025, office objections have not been complied with.
2. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter.
3. The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE
SH Ct-cmu, List No.: 2 Sl No.: 13