Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5374 (PAT)

Santosh kumar v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./66733/2025 · 2026-03-19

Sandeep Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66733 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-83 Year-2025 Thana- GORAUL District- Vaishali ====================================================== Santosh kumar Son Veerchandra Pandit R/o Village - Sahpur Gaush Manjiya, P.S. - Goraul (Kathara O.P.), Dist. - Vaihali. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Mritunjay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Narsingh Tanti, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 5 19-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Goraul (Kathara O.P.) P.S. Case No. 83/2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2)/ 191(3)/ 190/ 103 of the B.N.S. 3. As per the prosecution case, there is a direct allegation against the petitioner to hit on the head of the informant’s husband with a sword but no such injury mentioned in the postmortem report. Further it is alleged that other co- accused assaulted with Lathi, Danda and crushed with Rotavetor of the tractor. FIR named accused male persons who are alleged to have participated in the occurrence and driven the tractor which is alleged to be used for causing the death of the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66733 of 2025(5) dt.19-03-2026 2/2 victim. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel further submits that from the post-mortem report it appears that the deceased had met with an accident. Petitioner has one criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 21.07.2025. The petitioner undertakes to co- operate in the case/ trial. 5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this application for regular bail is allowed. 7. Accordingly, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-I, Vaishali at Hajipur /concerned Court below in connection with Goraul (Kathara O.P.) P.S. Case No. 83/2025. tusharika/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T