APHC010119062021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 7860/2021 Between: 1. UPPALA AMARESWARARAO, S/O SRIMNNARAYANA, AGED 65 YEARS, AGRICULTURE, RESIDENT OF D.NO. 1-99, OPP. RAJARAJA NARENDRA LIBRARY, GOVADA VILLAGE, AMRUTHALURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI AT AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, RURAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, GUNTUR, A.P. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE RURAL, TSUNDUR, TSUNDUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, AMRUTHALUR P.S. AMRUTHALURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N SRIRAM MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to Writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents, in particular respondents 3 and 4 in calling the petitioner to their respective police stations and making the petitioner to sit there even without there being any crime and in threatening him not to cultivate an extent of Ac. 10.32 cents covering by Survey Nos. 951/1, 952/1, 953,954, 969/1 and 969/4 of Govada village, Amruthalur Mandal and in interfering in civil disputes is as arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional and oppo'sed to the principles of natural justice, and consequently 2 direct the respondents not to interfere In civil disputes and not to call the petitioner to the police station of respondents 3 and 4 .” 2. Heard Sri Sreerama Murthy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, would submit that the police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the parties. 4. Recording the said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:06.10.2025 ASR 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.7860 of 2021 Dt.06.10.2025 Asr