APHC010323342021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 20001/2021 Between: 1. V.DILIP KUMAR, S/O.V.ROOPANATH NAIDU, AGED 33YEARS, MANGILIPATTU VILLAGE, CHANDRAGIRI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. RAMACHANDRA REDDY, CIRCLE INSPECTOR, CHANDRAGIRI POLICE STATION, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. CHINNA REDAPPA, SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHANDRAGIRI POLICE STATION, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 6. T.LALITHA, W/O.LATE T.RAMACHANDRA NAIDU, AGED 73 YEARS, R/O.D/NO.2-56, TIRUPATHI RURAL MANDAL, PADMAVATHIPURAM, SRINIVASPURAM, TIRUPATHI TOWN, CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the impugned action of respondents 4th and 5th in interference with the rights of petitioner over private property, in house site situated in Sy.No.314/1, in Mangilipattu Village, Chandragiri Mandal, Chittoor District, at the instance of 6th respondent and her relatives, for extraneous considerations, as illegal, arbitrary. Further action of 2nd and 3r respondents in not taking any action, in spite of representations made by the petitioner is highly illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14 (Sc. Article 300-A of Constitution of India, apart from Violation of Principles of Natural Justice consequently set aside the same Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G V SHIVAJI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “.... pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the impugned action of respondents 4th and 5th in interference with the rights of petitioner over private property, in house site situated in Sy.No.314/1, in Mangilipattu Village, Chandragiri Mandal, Chittoor District, at the instance of 6th respondent and her relatives, for extraneous considerations, as illegal, arbitrary. Further action of 2nd and 3r respondents in not taking any action, in spite of representations made by the petitioner is highly illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14 (Sc. Article 300-A of Constitution of India, apart from Violation of Principles of Natural Justice consequently set aside the same ...” Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that police are interfering in the civil disputes between the petitioner and unofficial respondents. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions would submit that respondent Police never interfered in the civil disputes between the Petitioner and the unofficial respondents. In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Respondent Police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties except following due process of law. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 20001 of 2021 07.10.2025 Mjl /*