Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53734 (AP)

Borra Dasthagiri v. State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/938/2022 · 2025-11-12

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010008862022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 938/2022 Between: 1. BORRA DASTHAGIRI, AGED 38 YEARS, W/O. KRISHNA, R/O.D.NO.1-88, BOSEBOMMA CENTER, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. KRISHNA, AGED 42 YEARS, S/O. SRIRAM MURTHY, R/O.D.NO.1- 88, BOSEBOMMA CENTER, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. YEMENANI HUSSAINE AMMA,, AGED 35 YEARS, W/O. SHERATH CHANDRA SRINIVAS, R/O.D.NO.1-88, BOSEBOMMA CENTER, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THANGETI GANGADHAR, AGED 30 YEARS, S/O. RAMANA, R/O.D.NO.1-88, BOSEBOMMA CENTER, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HOME DEPARTMENT, REP BY ITS PRINCIPALSECRETARY, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR, GUTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MANGALGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TADEPALLI P.S, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. CHIPILLA VENKAT, TATA MAMMA HIGH SCHOOL ROAD CHITTI NAGAR VIJAYAWADA KRISHNA DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. K KOUTILYA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents 3 and 4 in interfering with the Civil disputes, giving threatening calls to the Petitioners at the instance of the 5th Respondents illegal, arbitrary, and contrary to Article 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents 3 and 4, not to interfere in the civil disputes between the Petitioners and the 5th Respondent.” 2. Sri K.Koutilya, learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that, let there be a direction to the Police not to interfere in the civil disputes between the Petitioners and the unofficial Respondent. 3. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the Police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the parties. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, Police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the Petitioners and Respondent No.5, except under due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:13.11.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.938 of 2022 Dt.13.11.2025 Dinesh