IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 517 of 2025 Rajesh Sah son of Bhagedar Sah, resident of Kailash Nagar, House No. 40, P.O. & P.S.- Burmamines, District- East Singhbhum … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand …. … Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR For the Petitioner : Mr. Dilip Kumar Karmakar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Suraj Deo Munda, A.P.P. Order No. 03 Dated: 21.03.2025 The present criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed for modification of the order dated 06.08.2024 passed in A.B.A. No. 3158 of 2024, seeking extension of time to surrender before the concerned court below and to furnish bail bond in terms with the said order. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that earlier the petitioner was granted anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 06.08.2024 passed in A.B.A. No. 3158 of 2024 in connection with Sidhgora P.S. Case No. 209 of 2019 for the offences punishable under Sections 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Accordingly, it was observed that in the event of his arrest or surrender before the concerned court below within three weeks from the date of the said order, he would be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the concerned trial court. However, due to unavoidable circumstance, the petitioner could not surrender before the concerned trial court within the aforesaid period. Under the said situation, the petitioner has filed the present Cr.M.P. seeking extension of time to surrender before the 2 Cr.M.P. No. 517 of 2025 concerned trial court and to furnish bail bond in terms with the order dated 06.08.2024 passed in A.B.A. No. 3158 of 2024. 3. Mr. Suraj Deo Munda, learned A.P.P., while opposing the petitioner’s prayer for extension of time to surrender before the concerned trial court and to furnish bail bond, submits that since subsequent to grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner by this Court vide order dated 06.08.2024 passed in A.B.A. No. 3158 of 2024, he did not appear before the concerned trial court in time, the Processes under Sections 82 & 83 of Cr.P.C. were issued against him on 11.12.2024 and 25.01.2025 respectively. Hence, the prayer made in the present Cr.M.P. may not be entertained. 4. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering that due to non-compliance of the condition mentioned in the order dated 06.08.2024 passed in A.B.A. No. 3158 of 2024, the Processes under Sections 82 & 83 of Cr.P.C. have already been issued against the petitioner, I am not inclined to entertain the prayer made in the present petition. 5. The present Cr.M.P. is accordingly dismissed. Ritesh/ (Rajesh Shankar, J.)