BASAYYA S/O BASALINGAYYA HIREMATH, v. GOPAL S/O RANGAPPA CHOWRADDI,
MFA/101011/2015 · 2025-11-21
Chillakur Sumalatha
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 53728 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 53728 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:16028 MFA No. 101011 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF NOVEMBER 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 101011 OF 2015 (MV-I)
BETWEEN:
SHRI BASAYYA S/O. BASALINGAYYA HIREMATH, AGE: 63 YEARS, OCC: GOVERNMENT SERVICE & AGRICULTURE, R/O: GANESH GUDI, GADAG. …APPELLANT (BY SMT. SHASHIKALA L. DESAI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SHRI GOPAL S/O. RANGAPPA CHOWRADDI, AGE: MAJOR, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: HULKOTI, TQ: GADAG.
2.
THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, THE UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., LEA COMPLEX, NOW AT BRANCH OFFICE AT JUBLI CIRCLE, OPP: DIST. COURT, DHARWAD. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. S.S. KOLIWAD, ADVOCATE FOR R2;
NOTICE TO R1 IS SERVED)
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MOTOR VEHICLES ACT 1988 PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS FROM THE TRIBUNAL AND MODIFY THE AWARD IN MVC NO.180/2011 DATED 16.02.2015 BY THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, GADAG BY ENHANCING THE COMPENSATION AMOUNT BY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION OF THE APPELLANTS AND ETC.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS PASSED THEREIN AS UNDER:
GIRIJA A. BYAHATTI Digitally signed by GIRIJA A. BYAHATTI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DHARWAD
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:16028 MFA No. 101011 of 2015
CORAM: THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA)
No representation on appellant’s side on call.
Sri. S. S. Koliwad, learned counsel for respondent No.2 is present.
There was no representation on appellant’s side even on 30.10.2025 and 10.11.2025. Though the matter is listed on this day under the caption ‘for Dismissal’, yet there is no representation.
These facts reveal that appellant is not interested in prosecuting the matter. Hence the appeal stands dismissed for non- prosecution.
Sd/- (CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE gab CT-MCK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15