Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53725 (AP)

RAVI SUBBA RAO v. SRI.SHASHI BHUSHAN KUMAR

CC/1399/2024 · 2025-09-24

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010102252024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1399/2024 Between: 1. RAVI SUBBA RAO, S/O. SAMBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 9-37, MANTIIPALEM VILLAGE, NAGARAM MANDAL, BAPATLA DISTRICT, A.P, ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI SHASHI BHUSHAN KUMAR, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, 2. SRI SHAMSHER SINGH RAWAT, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. SRI P RANJIT BASHA, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, BAPATLA DISTRICT, BAPATLA. (ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT). 4. PULIPATI VENKATA RATNAM, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, DRAINAGE DIVISION, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, REPALLE, BAPATLA DISTRICT, A.P. (ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT). 5. SRI SANKARAPU MALLIKAIJUN RAO, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, K.W. DIVISION, TENALI GUNTUR DISTRICT. 6. SRI G SAI PRASED I A S, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, WATER RESOURCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 7. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR I A S, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 8. SRI P VIJAYAWA, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, BAPATALA DISTRICT, BAPATLA (ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT 9. SRI B MURALI KRISHNA, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, DRINAGE DIVISION, WATER RESOURCE DEPARTMENT, REAPLLE, BAPATALA DISTRICT, A.P., (ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT) 10. SRI PULIPATI VENKATARATNAM, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCE DEPARTMENT, K.W.DIVISION, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. RR 6 TO 10 IMPLEADED AS PER COURT ORDER DT.28.01.2025, VIDE IA NO.1 OF 2025 IN CC NO.1399 OF 2024. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to Pleased to take cognizance of the contempt committed by the Contemnors/Respondents herein and punish them with maximum imprisonment under Section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 r/w Article 215 of the Constitution of India for utter disobedience and disregard shown to the Final Order passed by the Honble A.P. High Court dated 08.11.2023 passed W.P. No. 26610 of 2023 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to grant leave to the petitioner to implead the Proposed Respondents as Respondent Nos.6 to 10 in the main Contempt Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SRINIVASA RAO NARRA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. RAMA RAO KOCHIRI 2. SOMA RAJU YELISETTI 3. SUSHMA YAGANTI 4. S SIVA KUMARI The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO:1399/2024 ORDER: This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 08.11.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.26610 of 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner(s) and learned counsel for the respondents. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the respondents submits that the respondents have complied with the orders dated 08.11.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.26610 of 2023 and hence, no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case. 4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the petitioner reported no objection for the submission made by the learned counsel for the respondents. 5. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the respondents, the Contempt Case is closed, granting liberty to the petitioner for initiating separate proceedings for further claim, if any. No order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 25.09.2025 BSP 115 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA (closed) Contempt Case No.1399 of 2024 25.09.2025 BSP