Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5372 (UTT)

VINOD v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA1/670/2025 · 2025-05-01

Ravindra Maithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL First Bail Application No. 670 of 2025 Vinod ….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent Present:- Mr. Bharat Singh, Advocate for the applicant. Ms. Rangoli Purohit, Brief Holder for the State. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral) Applicant Vinod is in judicial custody in FIR No. 354 of 2024, under Sections 147, 323, 302, 120-B IPC, Police Station Kotwali Manglor, District Haridwar. He has sought his release on bail. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. It is argued that the co-accused having similar role has already been granted bail. 4. Learned State Counsel admits this fact. 5. Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail. 6. The bail application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned. (Ravindra Maithani, J) 01.05.2025 Avneet/