Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5372 (RAJ)

JHAPAT BAHADUR SOP S/O SARPJEET SOP v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/1525/2025 · 2025-04-30

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:18188] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1525/2025 1. Jhapat Bahadur Sop S/o Sarpjeet Sop, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Lamki Chuwa Nagar Palika Ward No. 1, Village Lamki, Police Station Motipur District Kailali, Nepal At Present R/o Gote Walo Ki Bagichi, Transport Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Centre Jail Jaipur). 2. Rajesh Bahadur S/o Jhapat Bahadur Sop, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Lamki Chuwa Nagar Palika Ward No. 1, Village Lamki, Police Station Motipur District Kailali, Nepal At Present R/o Gote Walo Ki Bagichi, Transport Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Centre Jail Jaipur). 3. Krashan Bahadur Shah S/o Sur Bahadur Shah, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Village Pulle Tola, Police Station Vinayak, District Mangalsen, Nepal At Present R/o Gote Walo Ki Bagichi, Transport Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Centre Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 30/04/2025 1. The petitioners have preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.16/2025 registered at Police Station-Adarsh Nagar (Jaipur City (East), District-Jaipur City (East) for the offences under Sections 331(4), 305(a) and 306 of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the [2025:RJ-JP:18188] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1525/2025] petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case and the offences are triable by the Magistrate. Counsel further submits that there is no criminal antecedents against the petitioners. Petitioners are behind the bars since their date of arrest. The trial of the case may take considerable time, hence the bail application of the petitioners may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners-Jhapat Bahadur Sop S/o Sarpjeet Sop, Rajesh Bahadur S/o Jhapat Bahadur Sop and Krashan Bahadur Shah S/o Sur Bahadur Shah shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for their appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/81