TASHI PHUNSTOG AND OTHERS v. UT OF J AND K TH SECRETARY REVENUE DEPTT LEH AND OTHERS
WP(C)/2865/2021 · 2025-09-22
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5372 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5372 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
S.No. 160
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case No. :- WP (C) No. 2865/2021
Tashi Phunstog & Ors. …..Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)
Through: None Vs
UT of J & K & Ors. .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Vishal Sharma, DSGI
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 02.08.2024
1. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners today, so was the case on the last date of hearing also, which indicates that the petitioners have lost interest in prosecuting the instant petition any further.
2. This being so, the instant petition along with connected CMs is being dismissed for non prosecution.
3. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge JAMMU 02.08.2024 Manan
Manan Mahajan 2024.08.05 11:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document