Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53713 (AP)

Ravi Sudhakar, v. The state of Andhra Pradesh

WP/24150/2025 · 2025-10-12

R Raghunandan Rao, T C D Sekhar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010475682025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3529] MONDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 24150/2025 Between: 1. RAVI SUDHAKAR,, S/O. RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS R/O. D.NO.33-620/3, N.H-5 ROAD, CHILAKALURIPETA TOWN GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. - 522616 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOMEO DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATI 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, MANGALAGIRI. GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PALNADU DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CHILAKALURIPETA RURAL POLICE STATION PALNADU DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction more particular in the nature rit of Habeas Corpus directing the respondent no. 3 and 4 to produce the detenue Paramata Venkata Ramana S/o. Bapanayyi, Aged about 36 years, R/o. 1-156, samanasa merakupeta. Amalapuram, East Godavari district before this Hon'ble Court from their illegal custody and set him free and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondent Nos.3 and 4, more particularly. Respondent Nos.4, to produce the detenue Paramata Venkata Ramana S/o. Bapanayyi, Aged about 36 years, R/o. 1- 156, samanasa merakupeta, Amalapuram, East Godavari districtbefore this Hon'ble Court from their illegal custody and set him free pending disposal of the above writ petition pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PILLIX LAW FIRM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. THE ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court made the following order: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the detenue is at liberty now. He would further submit that additional documents need to be placed before the Court to demonstrate that the detenue had been unfairly detained. 2. In view of the fact that the detenue is not under illegal detention, we do not see any reason to continue this petition. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J ________________ T.C.D. SEKHAR, J Date: 13.10.2025 MJA 11 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 24150 of 2025 (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) 13.10.2025 MJA