JAGRAM MEENA SON OF RAM SAHAI MEENA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/1592/2025 · 2025-01-31
Anoop Kumar Dhand
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5371 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5371 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:4415] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1592/2025 Jagram Meena Son of Ram Sahai Meena, Aged About 60 Years, Address 100/S-2, Shiv Mandir Road, Vivek Vihar, Jagatpura, Jaipur (Rajasthan) - 302017. ----Petitioner Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Chief Secretary, Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan) - 302005.
2. Additional Chief Secretary, Water Resources Department (Wrd), Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan) -
302005.
3. Secretary To Government, Department Of Personnel (Dop), Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan) -
302005.
4. Secretary, Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ghooghara Ghati, Jaipur Road, Ajmer (Rajasthan) -
305001.
5. Director, Pension And Pensioners Welfare Department, Jyothi Nagar, Lal Kothi, Jaipur (Rajasthan) - 302015.
6. Joint Secretary To Government, Department Of Personnel (Dop) - (A-Iii/enquiry), Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan) - 302005.
7. Chief Engineer, Water Resource Department (Wrd), Indira Gandhi Nahar Pariyojna (Ignp) Bhawan, Bhawani Singh Road, Jaipur (Rajasthan) - 302005.
8. Chief Executive Officer (Ceo), Zila Parishad, Baran (Rajasthan) - 325205. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tribhuvan Narayan Singh JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order 31/01/2025
1. A limited prayer has been made by learned counsel for the petitioner for issuing direction to respondent No.3 to decide the pending representation.
[2025:RJ-JP:4415] (2 of 2) [CW-1592/2025]
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per the judgment passed by this Court in the case of “Pawan Meena Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors.” (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1665/2024) decided on 02.02.2024. It has been held by the Coordinate Bench of this Court that whenever any representation is submitted by the aggrieved person before the State Authorities, it is expected from the State Authorities to decide the same expeditiously as early as possible by passing a speaking order.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner further submits that representation submitted by the petitioner before the State Authorities is lying pending since 29.11.2024 and in spite of giving the considerable time, the same has not been decided by the Authorities concerned, for the reason, it is known to them. Under these circumstances, proper directions be issued to them to do the needful expeditiously as early as possible within time framed.
4. In view of the above, the present writ petition stands
disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 to decide the representation pending, if any, expeditiously as early as possible preferably within a period of week’s time from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order by passing a reasoned and speaking order.
4. Stay application and all pending application, if any, stand disposed of.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J AMIT/10