Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53699 (AP)

Ananthagiri Prabhu Electrical Social Welfare Society, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal

WP/6622/2015 · 2025-05-01

Subba Reddy Satti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMAR (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 6622 OF 2015 Between: Ananthagiri Prabhu Electrical Social Welfare Society, Regd.No.671/2011. Rep. by its President, Baka Venkata Rao S/o Dharmadas, Aged about 40 years, R/o D.No.1-15, Ananthagiri Mandal, Ananthagiri village, Visakhapatnam Dist. ...Petitioner. AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal, Secretary, Energy Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The A.P. Eastern Power Distribution Company Ltd., Rep. by its Chief General Manager, Construction, A.P.E.P.D.C.L., P&T Colony, Gurudwara, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. 3. The Superintending Engineer, A.P.E.P.D.C.L., Operations Circle, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. 4. Public Charitable Tribal Trust, rep. by regd. 00779/CORP, Rep. by its Ganjai Kasibabu, Managing Trustee, Paderu, Visakhapatnam District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to Issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3 respondent herein with regard to issuing tender Notification No.96 to 101/2014- 2015/D.No.590/15 dt.9.2.2015 in pursuant to which the works stated therein such as 1. 11 KV Minimuluru Feeder, 2. 11 KV Makavaram rd feeder, 3. Pedaguda feeder, 4. 5 Nos. 11 KV feeders of Paderu Sub- Division, 5.10 Nos. 11 KV feeders of Araku Sub-Division and 6. 7 Nos. 11 KV feeders of Chintapalli Sub-Division of Paderu Division from 1.3.2015 to 28.2.2016 are tendered without following the fair procedure and transparency and to declare the aforesaid tender notice as illegal, arbitrary and in gross violative of rights guaranteed under Article 14, 19(1 )(g) and 299 of Constitution of India as held by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Ramana Dayaramsetty vs International Air Port Authority of India reported in 1979 (3) see 489 and consequently set-aside the same. I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP. I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 8810 OF 20151 Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 6*'^ respondent herein to grant stay of all further proceedings in pursuant to tender notification No.96 to 101/2014- 2015/D.No.590/15 dt.9.2.2015 issued by the respondent herein alternative not to confirm and/or enter into agreement with 4'^ respondent for execution of works 1. 11 KV Minimuluru Feeder, 2. 11 KV Makavaram feeder, 3. Pedaguda feeder, 4. 5 Nos. 11 KV feeders of Paderu Sub- Division, 5.10 Nos. 11 KV feeders of Araku Sub-Division and 6. 7 Nos. 11 KV feeders of Chintapalli Sub-Division of Paderu Division from 1.3.2015 to 28.2.2016. Counsel for the Petitioner or in : SRIVMALLIK Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR ENERGY SRI P ANAND SESHU (SC FOR APEPDCL) The Court made the following: APHC010194672015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) S!¥i0 [3331] ■r«;. B FRIDAY .THE SECOND DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 6622/2015 Between: Ananthagiri Prabhu Electrical Social Welfare Society ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh Rep By Its Principal and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.VMALLIK Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR ENERGY (AP) 2.P ANAND SESHU (SC FOR APEPDCL) The Court made the following: :; ORDER :: Sri A.S. Virat, learned counsel representing Sri V. Mallik, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the same has become infructuous. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. 2. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/-NNAGAMMA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, One CC to SRI V MALLIK Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP FOR ENERGY (AP), High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] One CC to SRI P ANAND SESHU (SC FOR APEPDCL) Advocate [OPUC] Three CD Copies 1. 2. 3. 4. KSR (gsg) # '■til HIGH COURT DATED:02/05/2025 ORDER ^ 2 9 SEP 2025 WP.No.6622 of 2015 Co ■^^SNQjrrent Sectjofix^^ DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS AS INFRUCTUOUS