1 APHC010669632014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL REVISION PETITION No: 386 OF 2014 Between: 1. Chintapatte Jayakumari, W/o.C.Mohan, aged 37 years, Transport Business, R/o D.No.2/31, Near Panchayat Office, Karveti Nagaram (M), Chittoor Distrit. ...Petitioner AND 1. Margadarsi Chit Fund (P) Ltd, Kadapa, Rep by its Manager/Foreman, Kadapa. 2. Ramesh Sunitha, W/o.G.Ramesh, Aged 42 years, Interial Decarator & Building Contractor, R/o D.No.36-B, Velavan Street, West Kamakoti Nagar, Valasara Vakkam, Chennai. 3. Ayothinaidu Venkatesan, S/o Sengamnaidu Ayothinaidu, Interial Decorator and Real Estate Business, R/o D No.54, Gugan Street, West Kamakoti Nagar, Valasara Vakkam, Chennai. 4. Ragaswamy Krishnan Uma Rani, W/o B Vijaya Kumar, Occ:-Garment Business, R/o D.No.16, Mastanvali Garden Street, Vadapalani, Chennai. 5. Govindaswamy Ramesh, S/o Govindaswamy, Building Contractor, R/o D.No.36-B, Velavan Street, West Kamkoti Nagar, Valasara Vakkam, Chennai. (R-2 to 5 are not necessary party to the above CRP) ...Respondents 2 Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to against the decretal order dt.09.12.2013 in E.P.No.54 of 2013 in Arbitration No.40 of 2012 on the file off the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Puttur, Chittoor Dist. IA NO: 1 OF 2014(CRPMP 505 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased stay all further proceedings in pursuance of order dt.09.12.2013 in E.P.No.54 of 2013 in Arbitration No.40 of 2012 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Puttur, Chittoor Dist including warrant of attachment of movables of the petitioner. IA NO: 5 OF 2014(CRPMP 8268 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: P VENKATA RAMA SARMA Counsel for the Respondents: P DURGA PRASAD The Court made the following order: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI And THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM C.R.P.No.386 of 2014 ORDER: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari) This Civil Revision Petition, was filed by the Judgment-debtor No.5 against whom the first respondent/plaintiff decree-holder has filed the E.P. Sri P.Durga Prasad, learned counsel appearing for the decree-holder submits that subsequently the decree-holder/1st respondent has not pressed the E.P., which has been dismissed as not pressed on 13.07.2005. In view thereof, he submits that no cause of action survives to maintain the C.R.P. Recording the same, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous petitions, shall stand closed. ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J ______________________________ MAHESWARARAO KUNCHEAM, J Dt:04.12.2025 Rns/Gvk 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI and THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM C.R.P.No.386 of 2014 (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari) Dt: 04.12.2025 Rns/Gvk