APHC010619402025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 32165/2025 Between: 1. M VIJAYARAMA REDDY, S/O. DORASWAMY REDDY, AGED 52 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O. D.NO. 8-3-261, PARAMESWARI NAGAR, SULLURUPET, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, A.P SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, TIRUPATI. 3. 3. THE SUBDIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER / DY SP, SRI CITY, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, SRI CITY HI-TECH POLICE STATION, SRI CITY, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 5. SESHU PRIYA, W/O. VENUGOPALA KRISHNA, AGED 43 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 1/57/1, CHINNAPADUGUPADU VILLAGE, SULLURPET TOWN, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 6. V VENUGOPALA KRISHNA, S/O. NARASINGA RAO, AGED 55 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 1/57/1, CHINNAPADUGUPADU VILLAGE, SULLURPET TOWN, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 7. R MALLIKARJUNA NAIDU, S/O. DAMODAR NAIDU, R/O. MADIBAKA VILLAGE, ARPEDU MANDAL, TIMPATI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of Respondent Nos.2 to 4 in not registering an FIR against Respondent Nos.5 to 7 pursuant to complaint of the petitioner dated 24.10.2025 as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violative of Article 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India, consequentially direct Respondent Nos.2 to 4 herein to register an FIR against Respondent Nos.5 to 7 pursuant to complaint of the petitioner dated 24.10.2025 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V VINOD K REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioner for the following relief: “ ... to issue any writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of Respondent Nos.2 to 4 in not registering an FIR against Respondent Nos.5 to 7 pursuant to complaint of the petitioner dated 24.10.2025 as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violative of Article 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India, consequentially direct Respondent Nos.2 to 4 herein to register an FIR against Respondent Nos.5 to 7 pursuant to complaint of the petitioner dated 24.10.2025 and to pass ...” Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing for respondent State. Perused the material on record. Learned Assistant Government Pleader placed on record, the written instructions and would submit that after receipt of the complaint from the Petitioner which was sent through registered post, respondent Police registered the same as a case in Crime No.117 of 2025 of Sri City Police Station, and the case is under investigation and requested to dispose of the Writ Petition by passing appropriate orders. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that recording the said submission, this Writ Petition may be disposed of. In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Respondent Police are directed to follow due process of law with regard to the subject matter. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* Dinesh