APHC010732702018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] TUESDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 3086/2018 Between: 1. SMT. KONAKALLA (INNAMURI) CHARISHMA, HINDU, FEMALE, R/O.SOOE NO.3A-12/21, NUNNAVARI STREET, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. INNAMURI BALA SUBRAHMANYAM, HINDU, MALE,ADVOCATE, D.NO.31-1-2/1, JANDAPANJA ROAD, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT AT HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased toto set aside the Order dt.19.02.2018 passed in M.C.No.17 of 2015 on the file of the Family Court-cum-VII Addl. District and Sessions Judge, West Godavari District, Eluru and direct the respondent to pay the maintenance to the petitioner and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of (24) days in representing the Criminal Revision Case S.R.No.16547 of 2018 and pas IA NO: 2 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of ( 108 ) days in filing the Criminal Revision Case SR No.16547 of 2018 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. Y V ANIL KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2. THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO Criminal Revision Case No.3086 of 2018 ORDER: This Criminal Revision Case is filed against the order dated 19.02.2018 passed in M.C.No.17 of 2015 on the file of the learned Family Court-cum-VII Additional District and Sessions Judge, West Godavari District, Eluru. 2. Learned counsel appearing on both sides are present. 3. Heard and perused the material on record. 4. Both the learned counsel submit that the matter has been settled out of Court and parties have obtained divorce by mutual consent. Hence, they request permission of this Court to withdraw this Criminal Revision Case. 5. Permission is accorded. 6. Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as Withdrawn. Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO, J Date: 15.12.2025 M K K