APHC010104752020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH WEDNESDAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 6318/2020 Between: 1. CHALLA RAMANA,, S/O RAMULU, AGED 42 YEARS, OCCU. MASON, R/O DEEPAVALI VILLAGE, GARA MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 1. THE TAHSILDAR, GARA MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, OFFICE OF DIVISIONAL OFFICE SRIKAKULAM TOWN AND DISTRICT. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM TOWN AND DISTRICT. 4. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR. ANDHR Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one nature of writ of mandamus declaring the arbitrary and colorable exercise of power in extending the grama sachivalayam building towards the road side which was shown as road in the revised plan in EX P proceedings in 1153/2016/A dated 17 violation of Art 21 of the constitution of India and consequently direct the IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 6318/2020 CHALLA RAMANA,, S/O RAMULU, AGED 42 YEARS, OCCU. MASON, R/O DEEPAVALI VILLAGE, GARA MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM ...PETITIONER AND THE TAHSILDAR, GARA MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, OFFICE OF DIVISIONAL OFFICE SRIKAKULAM TOWN AND DISTRICT. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM TOWN THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR. ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one nature of writ of mandamus declaring the arbitrary and colorable exercise of power in extending the grama sachivalayam building towards the road side which was shown as road in the revised plan in EX P-1 and contrary to the 016/A dated 17-06-2016 of the 2nd respondent and it is violation of Art 21 of the constitution of India and consequently direct the IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3233] THE EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN CHALLA RAMANA,, S/O RAMULU, AGED 42 YEARS, OCCU. MASON, R/O DEEPAVALI VILLAGE, GARA MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM ...PETITIONER THE TAHSILDAR, GARA MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, OFFICE OF REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE SRIKAKULAM TOWN AND DISTRICT. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM TOWN THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the arbitrary and colorable exercise of power in extending the grama sachivalayam building towards the road side 1 and contrary to the 2016 of the 2nd respondent and it is violation of Art 21 of the constitution of India and consequently direct the 2 BKM,J W.P.No.6318 of 2020 respondents not to make any construction toward the road side which was shown in the revised plan as in Ex P-1 in an extent of 15 feet road in Sy No. 29 of Deepavali Village of Gara Mandalam of Srikakulam District IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents not to make any constructions in the 15 road in between grama sachivalayam and anganwadi building as shown in Ex P1 in Sy No. 29 of Deepavali Village of Gara Mandalam of Srikakulam District Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. . Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 3 BKM,J W.P.No.6318 of 2020 The Court made the following Order: In spite of the orders passed by this Court dated 21.08.2025, for making alternative arrangement either by appearing in-person or through the counsel, no such arrangement is made and no representation is made today for the petitioner. 2. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for default. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 08.10.2025 MDP