Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5365 (UTT)

PAYAL v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/346/2024 · 2025-02-19

Ashish Naithani, G Narendar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:1205-DB SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS 19.02.2025 WPCRL No. 346 of 2024 Hon’ble G. Narendar, C.J. Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. 1. Heard learned counsel Sri Pankaj Miglani on behalf of the petitioners, and Sri S.S. Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General with Sri G.C. Joshi, learned AGA on behalf of the State of Uttarakhand. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that after the grant of interim order, the petitioners have not been in contact with him, and he has not received any further instructions. 3. Learned Deputy Advocate General would submit that the order of grant of interim protection by this Court has been complied with. 4. The submissions of learned counsels are placed on record. 5. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition stands disposed off, as the petitioners’ counsel reports “no instructions”. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. (Ashish Naithani, J.) (G. Narendar, C.J.) 19.02.2025 19.02.2025 Rahul