Research › Search › Judgment
Bombay High Court · body
2025 DAILYLAW 53633 (BOM)
RAMDEV LAXMAN CHAUDAHARY v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS.
APPW/175/2025 · 2025-08-11
Shri Anil L Pansare, Shri M M Nerlikar
body2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 53633 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 53633 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 cr. wp 626.2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Criminal Application (APPW) No. 175 of 2025 in CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 626 OF 2025 [Ramdev Laxman Chaudhary vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------------------ - - - CORAM: ANIL L. PANSARE AND M. M. NERLIKAR, JJ.
DATED : 11-08-2025. By present application, the applicant is seeking to dispense with all office objections. It will be in the interest of all that office objections should be removed so that the documents should be readable. The application is accordingly rejected. The petitioner shall remove office objection within seven working days, failing which, the petition shall stand dismissed for non compliance of the order without further reference to the Court. If the office objections are removed, process the petition in accordance with the rules.
(M. M. NERLIKAR, J.) (ANIL L. PANSARE, J.) wasnik 2025:BHC-NAG:7849-DB