APHC010270372023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 14065/2023 Between: 1. PRASADU NAIDU, S/O. LATE APPA RAO, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/ O. PRASADUVANIPALEM VILLAGE, SONTYAM PANCHAYATI, ANANDAPURAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 2. SARIPALLI SIMHADRI, S/O. LATE MARIDAYYA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS. R/O. PRASADUVANIPALEM VILLAGE, SONTYAM PANCHAYATI, ANANDAPURAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 3. SARIPALLI NOOKALAMM,, W/O. SIMHADRI, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/O. PRASADUVANIPALEM VILLAGE, SONTYAM PANCHAYATI, ANANDAPURAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4. PRASADU KANNAMMA,, W/O. LATE APPA RAO, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/O. PRASADUVANIPALEM VILLAGE, SONTYAM PANCHAYATI, ANANDAPURAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 5. SARIPALLI APPALA RAJU,, S/O. SIMHADRI, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, R/O. PRASADUVANIPALEM VILLAGE, SONTYAM PANCHAYATI, ANANDAPURAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 6. SARIPALLI KANAKAMMA,, W/O. NARASIMHA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/O. PRASADUVANIPALEM VILLAGE,. SONTYAM PANCHAYATI, ANANDAPURAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. Page 2 of 6 ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AT AMARAVATI GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, , A.P. POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, MANAGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ANANDAPURAM POLICE STATION, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ANANDAPURAM POLICE STATION, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 6. PARVATHANENI SURESH KUMAR, S/O. LATE SUKHDEV, AGED 63 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.9-108, NARASIMHA NAGAR, GOPALAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in calling the petitioners to the police station by interfering with the civil dispute without following any known procedure though the civil dispute is pending between the petitioners and unofficial respondent as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, without jurisdiction, violation of principals of natural justice and in violation of Art 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to call the petitioners to the police station and not to interfere with the Civil dispute without following any known procedure though the civil dispute is pending between the petitioners and unofficial respondent to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents not to call the petitioners to the police station and not to interfere with the civil dispute without following any known procedure though the civil dispute is pending between the petitioners and unofficial respondent pending disposal of the Writ Petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. K JYOTHI PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. P RAJASEKHAR The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 14065 of 2023 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in calling the petitioners to the police station by interfering with the civil dispute without following any known procedure though the civil dispute is pending between the petitioners and unofficial respondent as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, without jurisdiction, violation of principals of natural justice and in violation of Art 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to call the petitioners to the police station and not to interfere with the Civil dispute without following any known procedure though the civil dispute is pending between the petitioners and unofficial respondent to pass.…” 2. Heard Sri K. Jyothi Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri V. Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the police are calling the petitioner to the police station and interfering in the civil disputes between the petitioners and the unofficial respondent. Learned counsel would submit that a direction may be given to the police. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions would submit that based on the complaint lodged by respondent No.6, a case in Cr.No.15 of 2023 for the offences punishable under Sections 447, 427, 506 r/w 34 of IPC was registered against the 1st, 2nd and 4th petitioners. He would further submit that the police are not interfering in the civil disputes between petitioner and the unofficial respondents. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 5. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the police not to interfere in the civil disputes between the petitioners and the unofficial respondent and also directed to follow due process of law relating to the crime which has been registered against the 1st, 2nd and 4th petitioners. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 09.12.2025. TVN HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.14065 of 2023 Dated.09.12.2025 TVN 136