Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53631 (KAR)

JUMMA MASJID v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WA/100133/2025 · 2025-09-01

S Sunil Dutt Yadav, Vijaykumar A Patil

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:11121-DB WA No. 100133 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL WRIT APPEAL NO. 100133 OF 2025 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: JUMMA MASJID, KURSAPUR VILLAGE, R/BY ITS PRESIDENT/MUTAVALLI, GOUSUSAB S/O MODINASAB MOHAMMEDSABNAVAR, AGE. 50 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. KURASAPUR VILLAGE, PO. BANKAPUR, TQ. SHIGGAON, DIST. HAVERI-581110. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. VISHWANATH S. BICHAGATTI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU- 560001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, HAVERI, DIST. HAVERI- 581110. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, SAVANUR, TQ. SAVANUR, DIST. HAVERI- 581110. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, TQ. SHIGGAON, DIST. HAVERI- 581110. Digitally signed by SAMREEN AYUB DESHNUR Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:11121-DB WA No. 100133 of 2025 5. KARNATAKA STATE BOARD OF WAKF, R/BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, CUNNINHAGAM ROAD, BENGALURU- 560001. 6. BADSHAH AGA S/O REHMAN AGA PATIL AGE. 46 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. BANKAPUR VILLAGE, TQ. SHIGGAON, DIST. HAVERI- 581110. 7. HAZARAT AGA S/O REHMAN AGA PATIL AGE. 38 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. BANKAPUR VILLAGE, TQ. SHIGGAON, DIST. HAVERI- 581110. 8. HASAN AGA S/O REHMAN AGA PATIL AGE. 46 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. BANKAPUR VILLAGE, TQ. SHIGGAON, DIST. HAVERI- 581110. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. V.S. KALASURMATH, AGA FOR R1 TO R4) THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S.4 OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 05.12.2024 PASSED IN W.P.NO.107324/2024 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE BY ALLOWING THIS WRIT APPEAL AND CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS WP NO.107324/2024 FILED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.6 TO 8, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS WRIT APPEAL COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:11121-DB WA No. 100133 of 2025 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV) Memo for withdrawal is filed which reads as hereunder; MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL “The Appellant herein humbly prays to permit the appellant for the withdrawal of the instant appeal with the liberty to seek appropriate relief by way of Writ Petition/Review Petition as regards the order passed in W.P.No.107324/2024. Hence, the memo.” In light of the same, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. In light of the observations made in WP No.107324/2024, registry is directed to return the certified copy of the order enclosed along with the appeal papers after retaining copy for the purpose of reference. Sd/- (S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL) JUDGE PJ, CT:VP LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 7