1 2025:CGHC:3624 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 468 of 2025 1 - Roman Catholic Church Risda Through It's Incharge And Parish Prist Fr. Thomas Lourd S/o Late Lourd Samy, Age 53 Years, R/o Roman Catholic Church Risda, Mission Para Risda, Post Risda, Police Station And Tahsil Masturi, District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Collector Cum District Magistrate District Bilaspur (C.G.) 3 - Sub-Divisional Magistrate Masturi, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - Tehsildar Tehsil Masturi, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 5 - Station House Officer Police Station Masturi, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 6 - Kamleshwar S/o Shri Bhuruwa Occupation- Advocate, R/o Nearby Govt. Primary School Risda, Naharpara, Risda, Post Risda, Police Station And Tahsil Masturi, District Bilaspur (C.G.) AMARDEEP CHOUBEY Digitally signed by AMARDEEP CHOUBEY Date: 2025.01.22 17:03:06 +0530 2 7 - Bhuvneshwar S/o Shri Bhuruwa R/o Nearby Govt. Primary School Risda, Naharpara, Risda, Post Risda, Police Station And Tahsil Masturi, District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Kishore Narayan, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Mr. Praveen Das, Dy. A.G. Hon'ble Justice Shri Bibhu Datta Guru Order on Board 21/01/2025 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioner is seeking a direction towards the Collector to constitute a team for demarcation of land situated at Khasra No.164 and 165 area ad-measuring 0.081 and 0.219 acres at P.H.N. No.29, village Risda, Tehsil Masturi, District Bilaspur, C.G. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed an application for demarcation of the land in question before the Tahsildar, Masturi, in the year 2022, which is still pending and till date, no demarcation has been made and no order has been passed by the Tahsildar. 3. Learned counsel for the State/respondents submit that if such application is still pending and it has not been decided yet, the same shall be considered and necessary order will be passed within a stipulated period, in accordance with law. 4. I have heard learned counsel for both the parties 5. From perusal of record, it appears that though the application for demarcation has been filed by the petitioner in the year 2022, but 3 the final order in the said demarcation proceedings has not been passed by the Tahsildar, Masturi till date, hence, looking to the fact and submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the Tahsildar, Masturi is directed to conclude the proceedings of demarcation over the said land within a period of 45 days from today, if the application is still pending before the Tahsildar, Masturi. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the writ petition is disposed of. SD/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Amardeep