Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53625 (CHH)

LAXMI PRASAD YADAV v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/12076/2025 · 2025-10-15

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:51555 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 12030 of 2025 1 - Lakhan Sai Kashi S/o Late Nira Ram, Aged About 63 Years R/o Ward No. 18, Sanjay Nagar, Post- Pharswani, Tahsil Barpali, District Korba (C.G.) 2 - Smt. Mayamati W/o Late Bahadul Kurre, Aged About 69 Years R/o- Ward No. 3, Ameradih, Post- Piharid, Tahsil- Malkharouda District Janjgir Champa (C.G.) --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Public Works Department, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Superintending Engineer Public Works Department Bilaspur Circle Bilaspur (C.G.) 3 - Executive Engineer, Pwd Champa Division, District Janjgir Champa (C.G.) 4 - Joint Director, Treasury, Account And Pension, District Janjgir Champa (C.G.) --- Respondent(s) and WPS No. 12076 of 2025 1 - Laxmi Prasad Yadav S/o Late Munuram Yadav Aged About 63 Years R/o Ward No. 14, Pail Para, Sarangarh, Tahsil- Sarangarh, District- Sarangarh- Bilaigarh (C.G.) ---Petitioner(s) Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Public Works Department, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Superintending Engineer Public Works Department Bilaspur Circle Bilaspur (C.G.) 3 - Executive Engineer Pwd Raigarh Division, District Raigarh (C.G.) 4 - Joint Director Treasury Account And Pension, District- Raigarh (C.G.) ... Respondents ARUN KUMAR DEWANGAN Digitally signed by ARUN KUMAR DEWANGAN Date: 2025.10.16 17:34:08 +0530 2 For Petitioners : Mr. R.L. Rajak, Advocate. For State : Mr. Keshav Prasad Gupta, Govt. Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 16/10 /2025 1. The issue involved in both the writ petitions has already been decided by this Court in case of Faguvaram Patel & Others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh [WPS No. 3870 of 2021 (decided on 30.09.2022]. 2. In view of the above, both the writ petitions also deserve to be disposed of in terms of the judgment passed by this Court in case of Faguvaram Patel (supra). 3. Accordingly, both the writ petitions stand disposed of. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Arun