Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:57179
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 13299 of 2025 • Shivani Singh W/o Shri Shailesh Singh Aged About 32 Years R/o Hemu Nagar, Tahsildar Gali, Near Durga Pandal Ground, Hemu Nagar, Bilaspur, Police Station - Torwa, Tahsil And District - Bilaspur (C.G.)
... Petitioner versus
1. Union Of India Through Its Secretary, Department Of Rail, Rail Bhawan, Raisina Road, New Delhi, Pin – 110001
2. Senior Deputy General Manager (Vigilance) Office Of Senior Deputy General Manager (Vigilance), South East Central Railway, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.)
3. Additional Railway Divisional Manager Office Of Additional Railway Divisional Manager, South East Central Railway, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.)
4. Divisional Railway Manager Office Of Divisional Railway Manager, South East Central Railway, Bilaspur Division, District Bilaspur (C.G.)
5. Divisional Personnel Officer Personnel Department, Divisional Railway Manager Office, South East Central Railway, Bilaspur Division, District Bilaspur (C.G.)
6. Sonam Yadav W/o Shri Davesh Kumar Aged About 35 Years R/o 04/1062, Ambedkar Puram, Housing Development Scheme, Kalyanpur, District Kanpur (U.P.)
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhishek Pandey, Advocate For Respondents No. 1 to 5 : Mr. Niraj Baghel, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Ramakant Mishra, Dy.S.G. MANISH YADAV Digitally signed by MANISH YADAV Date: 2025.11.26 11:45:03 +0530
2 Hon'ble Shri Justice
Narendra Kumar Vyas
Order on Board 25.11.2025
1. The petitioner whose father was working as Loco Pilot in the South East Central Railway died on 04.05.2014 has filed the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India claiming compassionate appointment.
2. The Central Government in exercise of power conferred under Section 14 of the Central Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 has issued notification confirming jurisdiction with regard to service dispute to the Central Administrative Tribunal, therefore, this writ petition is not maintainable before this Court, however, liberty is granted to the petitioner to take remedy available to him under the Central Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with aforesaid liberty granted in favour of the petitioner.
Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Manish