Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53608 (PAT)

Chhotu Chauhan @ Chhote Chauhan v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./42137/2025 · 2025-07-17

Chandra Prakash Singh

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42137 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-17 Year-2025 Thana- Badem P.S. District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Chhotu Chauhan @ Chhote Chauhan Son of Lakhdeo Chauhan Village -Khaira PS -NTPC Khaira District -Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Birendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Pradeep Narain Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 17-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Badem P.S. Case No. 17/2025 G.R. No. 159/2025 dated 11.03.2025 registered for the offences punishable u/s 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, total 185 litres of illicit country-made liquor was recovered out of which 60 litres of country-made liquor was recovered from sack in possession of the co-accused and 125 litres of illicit country-made liquor was recovered from Nawadih Sone diyara. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42137 of 2025(2) dt.17-07-2025 2/2 that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The other co-accused person has already been granted bail by this court vide order dated 30.04.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 27202/2025. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovery. The petitioner has one antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 16.04.2025. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner above- named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Aurangabad in connection with Badem P.S. Case No. 17/2025 G.R. No. 159/2025. 7. The application stands allowed. atul/- (Chandra Prakash Singh, J) U T