Rachiti Sravan Kumar, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/23247/2024 · 2025-12-19
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 53607 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 53607 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010452142024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
SATURDAY,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 23247 OF 2024 Between:
1. RachitiSravan Kumar,, S/o.Abishelem, Aged about 29 years, Occ. Cab Driver, R/o.D.No.130-14-680,1st line, Tirumala Nagar, Gorantla, Guntur District. 2. RachitiNagulu,, W/o.Abishelem, Aged about 43 years, Occ. House-wife, R/o.Madalavaripalem Village, Podili Mandal, Prakasam District. 3. DasariVikramBabu,, S/o.lateChenchaiah, Aged about 36 years, Occ. Coolie, R/o.D.No.1-53, Madalavaripalem Village, Podili Mandal, Prakasam District. 4. MabbuKumari,, W/o.Moshe, Aged about 48 years, Occ. House-wife, R/o.D.No.1-53, Madalavaripalem Village,' Podili Mandal, Prakasam District. ...Petitioners AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep., by its Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Ongole, Prakasam District, Andhra Pradesh. 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Kanigiri Division, Kanigiri, Prakasam District. 4. The Station House Officer, Marripudi Police Station, Marripudi, Prakasam District. 5. RacheetiKommuSwapnaPriya, W/o.RacheetiSravan Kumar, Aged about 29 years, Occ.
House-wife, R/o.D.No.1-80, Kellampalli Village, Marripudi Mandal, Prakasam District ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent in calling the petitioners to his police station regularly without registering any crime against the Petitioners and pressuring the Petitioners to settle the family dispute with the 5th respondent under the political influence as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Principles of Natural Justice and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents not to summon the petitioners to their police station unless any crime is registered against the petitioners and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondents not to summon the petitioners to their police station unless any crime is registered against the petitioners and pass Counsel for the Petitioners: DAGGUBATI RAMASWAMY REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 23247 OF 2024 The Court made the following order:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“…to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent in calling the petitioners to his police station regularly without registering any crime against the Petitioners and pressuring the Petitioners to settle the family dispute with the 5th respondent under the political influence as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Principles of Natural Justice and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents not to summon the petitioners to their police station unless any crime is registered against the petitioners and pass
2.
When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that the petition may be disposed of, since the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 3. Sri P.AjayBabu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents is in attendance. 4. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:20.12.2025
KKV