SMT. SHAHIN BEGUM AND 9 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS
WRIC/37032/2019 · 2025-06-30
Prakash Padia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 53606 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 53606 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 37032 of 2019 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J.
1. It is argued by Sri Vishal Tandon, learned counsel for the petitioner that he tried to serve notice upon the counsel who moved impleadment application on behalf of Abhay Singh but he refused to accept the notice.
2. In this veiw of the matter and in the interest of justice, list this matter peremptorily on 07.10.2025. September 24, 2025 saqlain Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Radha Mohan Pandey, Vishal Tandon Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ram Bahadur Singh, Suresh Singh (Prakash Padia,J.) Smt. Shahin Begum And 9 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SYED MOHAMMAD SAQLAIN HAIDER High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SYED MOHAMMAD SAQLAIN HAIDER High Court of Judicature at Allahabad