Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53603 (ALL)

VINAY SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

CRLP/8912/2025 · 2025-05-05

Mahesh Chandra Tripathi, Sandeep Chaudhary Joint Registrar Judicial

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:72166-DB Court No. - 42 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8912 of 2025 Petitioner :- Vinay Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Smt. Ushma Mishra,Swati Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Anil Kumar-X,J. 1. Heard Smt. Ushma Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner alongwith Ms. Swati Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State respondents. 2. The present writ petition is preferred inter-alia with following reliefs:- "(a) Issue writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order/Report Chalani dated 11.11.2024 issued by respondent no.3 i.e. Station House Officer, Police Station- Audyogik Kshetra, District Prayagraj, bearing proceeding/Case no.0-35, which was approved by respondent no.2 i.e. Assistant Police Commissioner, Karchana Commissionerate, Prayagraj, District Prayagraj, on 14.11.2024, under Section 129(g) of BNSS, P.S. Audyogik Kshetra, District Prayagraj, as well as subsequent proceedings initiated on the basis of impugned Report Chalani dated 11.11.2024. (b) Issue writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents and directing them not to initiate proceedings in pursuance of the impugned order/Report Chalani dated 11.11.2024 issued by respondent no.3 i.e. Station House Officer, Police Station- Audyogik Kshetra, District Prayagraj, bearing proceeding/Case no.0-35, which was approved by respondent no.2 i.e. Assistant Police Commissioner, Karchana Commissionerate, Prayagraj, District Prayagraj, on 14.11.2024, under Section 129(g) of BNSS, P.S. Audyogik Kshetra, District Prayagraj, as well as subsequent proceedings initiated on the basis of impugned Report Chalani dated 11.11.2024." 3. Considering the facts and circumstances, at this stage, we are not inclined to entertain the writ petition. However, as the dispute is purely civil in nature, in case the petitioner is having any grievance, he may move an appropriate application/representation to the Assistant Commissioner of Police concerned. In case any such application is moved, we hope and trust that the same would be considered in accordance with law. 4. The writ petition is disposed of. (Anil Kumar-X,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Order Date :- 6.5.2025 A. Pandey Digitally signed by :- ANAND PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad