Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53600 (KAR)

VINOD S/O SADANAND BONGALE v. SMT RATNAVVA W/O PANDARINATH RENAKE

WP/105077/2024 · 2025-09-25

Suraj Govindaraj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13370 WP No. 105077 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 105077 OF 2024 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. VINOD S/O. SADANAND BONGALE, AGE: 49 YRS, OCC: GOVERNMENT SERVANT, R/O. C.S. MISION 1/48/28, KAMAKSHI LAYOUT, BEHIND KHB COLONY, NAVANAGAR TQ. HUBBALLI , DIST. DHARWAD-580025. 2. KUMARI AISHWARYA D/O. VINOD BONGALE, AGE: 17 YRS, OCC: STUDENT, R/O. NO. 408. AMBIKA NAGAR, SAI NAGAR, HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD-580025. 3. KUMAR SHREEPAD S/O. VINOD BONGALE AGE. 14 YRS, OCC. STUDENT, R/O. NO. 408, AMBIKA NAGAR, SAI NAGAR, HUBBALLI DIST. DHARWAD-580025. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. V. P. VADAVI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. RATNAVVA W/O. PANDARINATH RENAKE, AGE. 65 YRS, OCC. STUDENT, R/O. NO. 408, AMBIKA NAGAR, SAI NAGAR, HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD-580025. 2. SATISH S/O. RAMACHANDRA NAIDU, AGE: 58 YRS, OCC: BUSINESS, Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13370 WP No. 105077 of 2024 R/O .LIG NO. 99 8TH CROSS, NAVANAGAR, HUBBALLI DIST. DHARWAD-580025. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE COMPROMISE DECREE DATED 07.11.2023 PASSED BY THE PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., HUBBALLI, ENTERED INTO BY THE RESPONDENT NO. 1 ON BEHALF OF MINOR PETITIONER 2 AND 3 WITH THE RESPONDENT NO. 2 AS ILLEGAL AND VOID, AND CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE PETITION, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. Despite the order dated 29.08.2025, office objections have not been complied with. 2. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the matter. 3. The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE SH CT:ANB List No.: 2 Sl No.: 104