IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP Nos. 764 & 766/2025 Decided on: 10.01.2025 1. CWP No. 764/2025 Raman Kumar …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents. 2 CWP No. 766/2025 Sunil Kumar …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Anr. .…Respondents. ………………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners: Mr. Kulwant Singh Gill, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua , J Notice. Mr. L.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the legal issue involved in these case has already been adjudicated upon; Petitioners have filed representations at Annexure P-3 for the redressal of their grievances raised in the writ petition to the 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 respondents, but till date the same have not been adjudicated upon; Petitioners would be satisfied in case competent authority is directed to decide the said representations in accordance with law within a time bound schedule. The above is not objected to by learned Additional Advocate General. 3. In view of the above, these writ petitions are disposed of by directing respondent No.2/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioners, in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from today. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioners. The writ petitions stand disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 10th January 2025(rohit)