HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 39789 of 2013 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J. 1. The matter was taken up in the revised list. However, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition, nor has any adjournment slip has been moved. Learned counsel for the respondent is present. 2. In the absence of any effective representation, it appears that the cause of action has become stale and the writ petition has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 4. In case the petitioner feels that the matter still survives, liberty is granted to her to move an application for recalling this order within six weeks from today. September 22, 2025 o.k. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Atul Kuma Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ram Raj Singh (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Smt. Funnan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- OM KRISHNA CHOUDHARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad