Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53592 (PNJ)

SATENDER KUMAR SHARMA v. HARYANA SHAHARI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN AND OTHERS

CWP/12744/2025 · 2025-05-06

Alok Jain, Sudhir Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-12744-2025 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-12744-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 06.05.2025 Satender Kumar Sharma ......Petitioner Versus Haryana Shahari Vikas Pradhikaran and others .........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN Present: Mr. Namit Gautam, Advocate, for the petitioner. *** SUDHIR SINGH (ORAL) By way of the present writ petition, the petitioner has sought issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to handover the vacant physical possession of Plot No.220P (measuring 6 Marlas), Sector-77, Urban Estate, Faridabad or to provide another plot of similar size on the same price as mentioned in the allotment letter (Annexure P-1), which was further re-allotted to the petitioner vide re-allotment letter dated 11.01.2022 (Annexure P-4), in terms of the policy dated 06.08.2024 (Annexure P-17). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for redressal of his grievance, the petitioner shall approach the AJAY PRASHER 2025.05.15 15:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-12744-2025 (O&M) -2- competent authority by filing an appropriate representation/application. 3. Served with the advance copy of the petition, Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate, appears on behalf of the respondent- HSVP and submits that if, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the same shall be considered and decided by the competent authority, in accordance with law. 4. Without commenting on merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of by giving liberty to the petitioner to file an appropriate representation before the competent authority-respondent No.3 (Estate Officer, HSVP, Faridabad). In case, any such representation is filed, the respondent No.3 shall look into the same and pass an appropriate reasoned order thereon, in accordance with law, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of filing/receipt of such representation. 5. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE 06.05.2025 Ajay Prasher Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No AJAY PRASHER 2025.05.15 15:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document