SATENDER KUMAR SHARMA v. HARYANA SHAHARI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN AND OTHERS
CWP/12744/2025 · 2025-05-06
Alok Jain, Sudhir Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 53592 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 53592 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP-12744-2025 (O&M)
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-12744-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 06.05.2025
Satender Kumar Sharma
......Petitioner Versus Haryana Shahari Vikas Pradhikaran and others
.........Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN
Present: Mr. Namit Gautam, Advocate,
for the petitioner.
*** SUDHIR SINGH (ORAL)
By way of the present writ petition, the petitioner has sought issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to handover the vacant physical possession of Plot No.220P (measuring 6 Marlas), Sector-77, Urban Estate, Faridabad or to provide another plot of similar size on the same price as mentioned in the allotment letter (Annexure P-1), which was further re-allotted to the petitioner vide re-allotment letter dated 11.01.2022 (Annexure P-4), in terms of the policy dated 06.08.2024 (Annexure P-17).
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for redressal of his grievance, the petitioner shall approach the AJAY PRASHER 2025.05.15 15:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-12744-2025 (O&M)
-2- competent authority by filing an appropriate representation/application.
3.
Served with the advance copy of the petition, Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate, appears on behalf of the respondent- HSVP and submits that if, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the same shall be considered and decided by the competent authority, in accordance with law.
4.
Without commenting on merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of by giving liberty to the petitioner to file an appropriate representation before the competent authority-respondent No.3 (Estate Officer, HSVP, Faridabad). In case, any such representation is filed, the respondent No.3 shall look into the same and pass an appropriate reasoned
order thereon, in accordance with law, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of filing/receipt of such representation.
5.
Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand
disposed of.
(SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE
(ALOK JAIN) JUDGE 06.05.2025 Ajay Prasher
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable
: Yes/No AJAY PRASHER 2025.05.15 15:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document