Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53587 (AP)

SMT DASARI MARUTHI v. STATE OF AP

WP/1606/2021 · 2025-10-07

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010022702021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 1606 OF 2021 Between: 1. SMT DASARI MARUTHI, w/o B.Amarendra, aged about 48 years, occ. Superintendent Somasila Project r/o Flat No. 201, Leela Pride Apartment, Sujathamma Colony Podalakuru Road, Nellore ...Petitioner AND 1. STATE OF AP, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Nellore, SPSR Nellore District. 3. The Station House Officer, IV Town Police Station, Nellore, SPSR Nellore District. 4. Central Bureau of Investigation, 1-83-21/4, MVP Double Rd, Visakhapatnam Andhra Pradesh ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: KAUSHIK KUMBHAJADALA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondents:M.SRAVAN KUMAR,Spl.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR FOR C.B.I. The Court made the following order: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 1606 of 2021 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the action of 3rd respondent in filing the final report pertaining to FIR No. 221 of 2015 by the 3rd respondent , as being illegal, arbitrary, unjust and unconstitutional and further direct the 4th respondent i.e. CBI for conducting fresh investigation and to file fresh charge sheet in pursuant to the FIR No. 221 of 2015 registered by the 3rd respondent…” 2. None represented on behalf of the Petitioner. It appears that the petitioner has no interest in prosecuting the Writ Petition. 3. Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents is in attendance. 4. In that view of the matter, this Writ Petition is dismissed for Non- prosecution. No order as to Costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 08.10.2025. Dvs HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No. 1606 of 2021 Dated.08.10.2025 Dvs 175