Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53577 (AP)

Ramanaboyina Tej Kumar, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/34252/2022 · 2025-11-17

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010562212022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 34252/2022 Between: 1. RAMANABOYINA TEJ KUMAR, S/O LATE DAVID, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, C/MALA OCC R.M.P., R/O. ADIGOPPALA VILLAGE, DURGI MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT., ERSTWHILE GUNTUR TOWN. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, ANDHRA PRADESH 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PALNADU DISTRICT, NARASARAOPET. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GURAZALA DIVISION, GURAZALA, PALNADU DISTRICT 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, DURGI POLICE STATION, DURGI, PALNADU DISTRICT. 5. SHAIK HUSSAIN MOTHADU HUSSAIN, S/O. NABI, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, VRA OF ADIGOPPALA, R/O. ADIGOPPALA VILLAGE, DURGI MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT. 6. NALABOTHULA CHINNABBAI VENKATESWARLU, S/O. GOPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE PESTICIDE BUSINESS, R/O. ADIGOPPALA VILLAGE, DURGI MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, writ or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents not conducting investigation in proper perspective and effective manner in Crime No 156/2022 on the file of Durgi Police Station, Palnadu District as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14, 21 of the Constitution of India and Code of Criminal Procedure and consequently direct the respondents 2 2 to 4 to complete the investigation in a fair and proper manner and to take action against the respondent No.5 and 6 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KALE VIJAYA RAJU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioner for the following relief: “ ... to issue an order, writ or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents not conducting investigation in proper perspective and effective manner in Crime No.156/2022 on the file of Durgi Police Station, Palnadu District as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14, 21 of the Constitution of India and Code of Criminal Procedure and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 4 to complete the investigation in a fair and proper manner and to take action against the respondent No.5 and 6 and pass ...” Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing for respondent State. Perused the material on record. The grievance of the Petitioner is that the crime is of the year 2022 and investigation of the subject crime is not yet completed and sought for a direction to respondent Police. Learned Assistant Government Pleader requested to dispose of the Writ Petition by passing appropriate orders. In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Respondent Police are directed to conclude the investigation of the subject crime and file a final report/charge sheet within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order, according to law. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 34252 of 2022 18.11.2025 Mjl /*