Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53575 (CHH)

RAGHUNANDAN LODHI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/6588/2025 · 2025-12-16

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:61402-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 6588 of 2025 Raghunandan Lodhi S/o Mangal Lodhi Aged About 40 Years R/o Gram - Devpura, Police Station - Salhewara, District - Khairagarh Chuikhadan Gandai (K.C.G.) Chhattisgarh --- Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Home, Ma- hanadi Bhawan, Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Director General of Police Police Headquarters, Naya Raipur, Dis- trict - Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - The Collector K.C.G. District - Khairagarh Chuikhadan Gandai (K.C.G.) Chhattisgarh 4 - Superintendent of Police K.C.G., District - Khairagarh Chuikhadan Gandai (K.C.G.) Chhattisgarh 5 - Station House Officer Police Station - Salhewara, District - Khaira- garh Chuikhadan Gandai (K.C.G.) Chhattisgarh ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Ayush Lall, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Yashwant Singh Thakur, Additional Advocate General Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 17.12.2025 1. Heard Mr. Ayush Lall, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Yashwant Singh Thakur, learned Additional Advocate General, appearing for the State/respondents ANURADHA TIWARI Digitally signed by ANURADHA TIWARI Date: 2025.12.17 16:16:29 +0530 2 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following relief(s):- “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to strike down Section 4 and Rule 3 of Chhattisgarh Dharmik Bhawan Tatha Sthan Viniyaman Rules, 1985 being violative to Article 14, 19(1)(b), 21 and 25 and ultra vires to the provisions of the Constitution. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to Quash/set-aside all the written and verbal notices which had been served under this Act and Rules to the Christians praying in their house. 10.3 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the police that the notice shall not be served under this act and rules. 10.4 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the police to maintain peace and tranquility among the communities. 10.5 Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court deemed fit in facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be granted to the petitioner including the cost of the petition.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition stating that a writ petition bearing WPC No.6380/2025 has already been filed on the same subject matter, in which this Court had directed 3 the parties to exchange their pleadings within a period of six weeks. 4. In view of the above, as prayed by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Anu