Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5357 (AP)

Bora Ram Babu, v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/2568/2020 · 2025-09-14

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010044432020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 2568/2020 Between: 1. BORA RAM BABU, S/O LATE APPALA NARASAYYA @ APPALA SWAMY, AGED ABOUT 40 YRS, OCC R/O H.NO.6-13/3-48/6, SAI BABA TEMPLE STREET, GOLLAPALEM GATTU, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. UPPADA APPAYYAMMA, W/O. RAMOJI AGED ABOUT 52 YRS, OCC R/O H.NO.1-49-283, BANGALA METTU, TAGARAPUVALSA, BHEEMUNIPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. MUGADA NARAYANAMMA, W/O. SATYANARAYANA AGED ABOUT 40 YRS, OCC HOUSEHOLD, R/O. 24-78, BOTTAVANIPALEM, MADHURAWADA, VISAKHAPATNAM. 4. PERUGARU YELLAYAMMA, W/O. LOKANATHAM AGED ABOUT 37 YRS, OCC HOUSEHOLD, R/O. KONDAPETA, KOTHA PARDESIPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, , VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, BHIMUNIPATNAM MANDAL. VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT 5. VISAKHAPATNAM URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, REP BY ITS VICE CHAIRMAN, UDYOG BHAVAN, SIRIPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM. 6. VISAKHA CITY POLICE, HOUSING COLONY-RESIDENT AL WELFARE ASSOCIATION REP BY ITS PRESIDENT MALLA MA HESWAR RAO H.NO. 49-3-2, LALITHA NAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM- 16. 7. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE VISAKHAPATNAM. 8. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PS BHIMUNIPATNAM 2 VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. C M R VELU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. A VIVEKANANDA 2. GP FOR HOME (AP) 3. SOMISETTY GANESH BABU SC FOR VUDA AND MUDA 4. V V SATISH The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in aiding the illegal activities of Respondent No.6, abusing their official position in fabricating false documents, implicating innocent personnel in false criminal cases and preventing the Petitioners from enjoying their lands by threatening them to not go to their lands as arbitrary, illegal, violative of Article 21 and 300 A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents to rectify the revenue records, layout granted by VUDA and quash the FIR No. 271 of 2019 dated 18-08-2019 on the file of Respondent No.8 and render protection to the lives and property of the Petitioners.” 2. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that investigation in FIR No.271 of 2019 on the file of Bheemunipatnam Police Station, Visakhapatnam Police Station has been completed and charge sheet has also been filed. 3. None represented for the Petitioners. 4. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:15.09.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.2568 of 2020 Dt.15.09.2025 Dinesh