APHC010189472024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] SATURDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 10021/2024 Between: 1. SHAIK SUBHANI, S/O MEERA MOHIDEEN, AGED ABOUT- 38 YEARS, R/O D.NO 11-866, MANGALAGIRI,GUNTUR, ANDHRA PRADESH -522503 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR URBAN, GUNTUR DT. 522004. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MANGALAGIRI TOWN, GUNTUR DT.522503. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No 3 in not registering the FIR as violative of section 154 CRPC and the law settled by the Honble Apex Court in Lalita Kumari v. State of U.P and Sindhu Janak Nagargoje Vs State Of Maharasta, consequently direct the respondent to initiate action against the 4th respondent for not registering the FIR and direct the respondents to register the FIR in pursuance of the report dated 17.03-2024 and 30.03.2024 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KARUMANCHI INDRANEEL BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioner for the following relief: “ ... to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.3 in not registering the FIR as violative of section 154 CRPC and the law settled by the Honble Apex Court in Lalita Kumari v. State of U.P and Sindhu Janak Nagargoje Vs State Of Maharasta, consequently direct the respondent to initiate action against the 4th respondent for not registering the FIR and direct the respondents to register the FIR in pursuance of the report dated 17.03-2024 and 30.03.2024 and to pass ...” Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing for respondent State. Perused the material on record. Perused the material on record. Learned Assistant Government Pleader placed on record, the written instructions and would submit that there is a dispute between petitioner and others with regard to foundry shop and this Court in WP No.1874 of 2023 issued orders on 13.10.2023 to approach the competent civil court to resolve the issue. Due to the civil disputes between the parties, crime is not registered by the respondent Police and requested to dispose of the Writ Petition by passing appropriate orders. In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Petitioner is at liberty to work out the remedy before appropriate forum according to law. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 10021 of 2024 22.11.2025 Mjl /* Dinesh