APHC010277772019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] FRIDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 13100/2019 Between: 1. MR. CHITTALA SATISH, S/O. CHITTALA PEDDA DOSAIAH AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS OCC UNEMPLOYED, R/O H.NO 1- 109/ 1,MADIKI VILLAGE AND POST, ALAMURU MANDALAM,EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUAI, ANDHRA PRADESH 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY ENERGY, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, ANDHRA PRADESH 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, KAKINADA. 4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, KAKINADA. 5. THE CHIEF MANAGING DIRECTOR, EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF A.P MT COLONY, SETHAMMA DHARA, VISHAKHAPATNAM ANDHRA PRADESH ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.1 to 5 not paying compensation the petitioner's family as the son got effected for the negligence of the Electricity department and the respondent 3 not taking action against such culprits caused mental agony and not paying any compensation by the respondents are illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory and violation of the settle law and violation of articles 14,19 and 21 of constitution of India, and consequently direct the respondents to pay compensation of Rs. 1,00,00,000/- one (mores and all medical expenses of Rs.20,00,000/-, free education to the child as aspired by him and for maintenance of the child the mother of the child must be engaged in the 5th respondent department as regular employee and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent no 5 to take the wife of the petitioner as regular employee of the respondent organization pending disposal of writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M/S MARY LEGAL CONSULTANCY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL) 2. GP FOR ENERGY (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.13100 OF 2019 ORDER: None appeared for the petitioner either physically or through video conference, though the matter is posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’. There was no representation for the petitioner on the previous adjournments also. 2. Learned Standing Counsel for APEPDCL is in attendance. 3. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 05.12.2025 Pmk 4 17 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:13100 OF 2019 Date: 05.12.2025 Pmk