APHC010613042016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE Between: 1. ALLADA POORNA SATYA GOWRI SHANKER, E.G.DT.,, S/O.SURYA PRAKASHA RAO, R/O.D.NO.46 RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT A.P. 1. THE STAYE OF AP REP PP PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT AT HYDERABAD. 2. ALLADA SRAVANTHI, W/O.ALLADA POORNA SATYA GOWRI SHANKER, OCC:EMPLOYEE R/O.MIG NO.139, D.NO.39 LAXMI NILAYAM, MADHAVADHARA, VUDA LAYOUT, VISAKHAPANTAM, A.P. Revision filed under Section 3 circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Case, the High Court may be pleased to present this Memorandum of Grounds revision case to this Hon'ble court against the order dated 11.05.2016 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Visakhapatnam in Criminal Appeal No.344 of 2015 modifying the order dt.05.08.2015 passed in CrI.M.P.No.4955 of 2014 in DVC No.31/2012 on the file of the III Metropolitan Magistrate Court, IA NO: 1 OF 2016(CRLRCMP 2877 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1995/2016 ALLADA POORNA SATYA GOWRI SHANKER, E.G.DT.,, S/O.SURYA R/O.D.NO.46-5-30, UPPU STREET, JAMPETA, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT A.P. ...PETITIONER AND THE STAYE OF AP REP PP ANR, REP.BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT AT HYDERABAD. ALLADA SRAVANTHI, W/O.ALLADA POORNA SATYA GOWRI SHANKER, OCC:EMPLOYEE R/O.MIG NO.139, D.NO.39 LAXMI NILAYAM, MADHAVADHARA, VUDA LAYOUT, VISAKHAPANTAM, A.P. ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Case, the High Court may be pleased to present this Memorandum of Grounds revision case to this Hon'ble court against the order dated 016 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Visakhapatnam in Criminal Appeal No.344 of 2015 modifying the order 2015 passed in CrI.M.P.No.4955 of 2014 in DVC No.31/2012 on the file of the III Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Visakhapatnam. IA NO: 1 OF 2016(CRLRCMP 2877 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3369] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO ALLADA POORNA SATYA GOWRI SHANKER, E.G.DT.,, S/O.SURYA 30, UPPU STREET, JAMPETA, ...PETITIONER ANR, REP.BY ITS PUBLIC ALLADA SRAVANTHI, W/O.ALLADA POORNA SATYA GOWRI SHANKER, OCC:EMPLOYEE R/O.MIG NO.139, D.NO.39-33-76, LAXMI NILAYAM, MADHAVADHARA, VUDA LAYOUT, ...RESPONDENT(S): CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to present this Memorandum of Grounds revision case to this Hon'ble court against the order dated 016 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Visakhapatnam in Criminal Appeal No.344 of 2015 modifying the order 2015 passed in CrI.M.P.No.4955 of 2014 in DVC No.31/2012 on the praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of the certified copy of the CrI.M.P.No.4955 of 2014 in DVC No.31/2012 on the file of the III Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Visakhapatnam and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 2 OF 2016(CRLRCMP 2926 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the orders dated 11.05.2016 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Visakhapatnam in Crl.A.No.344/2015 modifying the order dated 05.08.2015 passed in Crl.MP.No.4955/2014 in DVC.No.31/2012 on the file of the III Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Visakhapatnam. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T S N MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. A S C BOSE 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following ORDER: 1. The present Criminal Revision Case, filed under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, ‘Cr.P.C.’) is preferred on behalf of the petitioner/appellant challenging the judgment dated 11.05.2016 passed in Crl.A.No.344 of 2015 by the learned Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Visakhapatnam (for short, ‘the 1st Appellate Court’), modifying the order dated 05.08.2012 passed in Crl.M.P.No.4955 of 2014 in D.V.C.No.31 of 2012 on the file of the III Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Visakhapatnam (for short, ‘the Trial Court’). 2. For the sake of brevity, the parties shall hereinafter be referred to as they are arrayed in this Criminal Revision Case. 3. The record shows that before the Trial Court, the 2nd respondent herein initially filed Crl.M.P.No.4955 of 2014 in D.V.C.No.31 of 2012 under Section 23(c) of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, seeking a direction to the petitioner herein (1st respondent) to pay ₹25,000 per month as interim maintenance for herself and her infant daughter, or, in the alternative, an appropriate direction. 4. When the matter was taken up for hearing, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. 5. Sri K. Sandeep, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor representing the 1st respondent / State, contends that as per the status report obtained from the E- courts portal, D.V.C.No.31 of 2012 was disposed on 24.04.2019. He further contends that, in light of the dismissal of the main case, the present Criminal Revision Case no longer survives for independent adjudication and has, therefore, become infructuous. 6. This Court, upon a careful consideration of the submission advanced by the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor and in view of the fact that the D.V.C.No.31 of 2012 was disposed on 24.04.2019, is of the considered view that nothing further to be adjudicated in the present Revision Case. Since the main case has been concluded and has attained finality, any challenge to an interlocutory order passed therein has lost its relevance, and adjudicating the present Criminal Revision Case would serve no useful purpose. 7. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. Interim orders, if any, granted earlier shall stand vacated, and all pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO, J Date: 14.10.2025 S A K THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO Criminal Revision Case No.1995 of 2016 Date: 14.10.2025 S A K 104