1 2025:CGHC:57132 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1400 of 2020 Smt. Jaybati Netam Wd/o Late Shri Ramsingh Netam, Aged About 40 Years R/o Village And Post- Dhanora, Tahsil- Keshkal, District- Kondagaon, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner. versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Senior Account Officer Through Office Of Accountant General Chhattisgarh, Zero Point, Balodabazar Road, Infront Of Vidhan Sabha, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - District Education Officer Kondagaon, District- Kondagaon, Chhattisgarh. 4 - District Treasury Officer Kondagaon, District- Kondagaon, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Block Education Officer (Tribal Welfare And Development Department) Farasgaon, District- Kondagaon, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents. For Petitioner : Shri RS Patel, Advocate. For State/Res. : Shri Ritesh Giri, Panel Lawyer. For Respondent No.2: Shri Raj Kumar Gupta, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari Order on Board 25/11/2025 1. At the outset, counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to AVINASH SHARMA Digitally signed by AVINASH SHARMA Date: 2025.11.25 16:51:32 +0530 2 withdraw this petition with liberty to file representation before the High Power Pension Redressal Committee who in turn shall decide the said representation, in an expeditious manner, after affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 2. Counsel for the other side would not oppose the aforesaid prayer. 3. Having considered the submissions of counsel for the parties and the fact that Respondent No.2 has only communicated to the petitioner and to the Block Education Officer, Farasgaon, District Baster C.G. regarding minus balance to the tune of Rs.1,42,369/- in GPF Account, it is directed that if the petitioner files a representation before the High Power Pension Redressal Committee, the said Committee shall examine the issue and decide the same in an expeditious manner preferably within an outer limit of 8 months of this order, after affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and to the concerned Department. 4. It is observed that if any grievance in this regard still remains, the petitioner would be at liberty to file a petition as and when occasion so arises. 5. With the aforesaid observation/direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Deepak Kumar Tiwari) Judge Avinash