1 2025:CGHC:57173 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 3464 of 2025 1 - Smt. Vijyeta Swarnkar W/o Shri Pradip Soni Aged About 37 Years Presently Working As Shiksha Karmi Grade-1, At Govt. Boys Hr. Secondary School, Sarsiva, District Baloda Bazar Chhattisgarh, District Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - Pradip Kumar S/o Late Manharan Lal Soni Aged About 34 Years R/o Tenda Nawapara Thana Gharghoda, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 2 - Damrudhar Swarnkar S/o B.L. Swarwlar Aged About 47 Years R/o Basant Vihar, Jashpur Nagar, Chhattisgarh, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Miss Maduri Swarnkar W/o Damrudhar Swarnkar Aged About 39 Years R/o Basant Vihar, Jashpur Nagar, District Jashpur Nagar, Chhattisgarh, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Ms. Rohini Soni W/o Late Manharanlal Soni Aged About 60 Years R/o Tenda Nawapara Thana Gharghoda, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 5 - Durgesh Soni S/o Late Manharanlal Soni Aged About 38 Years R/o Tenda Nawapara Thana Gharghoda, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 6 - State Of Chhattisgarh By The District Collector, Raigarh Taluka Raigarh District Raigarh Chhattisgarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause title as taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Ms. Mamta Mahilange, Advocate For Respondents No. 1 to 5 : Ms. Vijay Laxmi Soni, Advocate RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Digitally signed by RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Date: 2025.11.25 18:16:43 +0530 2 For State/Respondent No. 6 : Ms. Prabha Sharma, Panel Lawyer (Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Order on Board 25/11/2025 1. Heard on Cr.M.P., application for restoration of Criminal Revision No.1388/2019, which was dismissed vide order dated 17.10.2025 for want of prosecution. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that on the date of hearing i.e. 17.10.2025, arguing counsel Mr. Anshul Ranjan Shrivastava was out of station, therefore, he could not appear when the case was taken up for hearing, therefore, the same was dismissed for want of prosecution. Hence, she prayed that the said mistake was bona昀椀de and the petitioner wants to contest the case on merits, thus the instant Cr.M.P. may be allowed. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents raised objection. 4. On due consideration and for the reasons mentioned in the restoration application, instant Cr.M.P is hereby allowed. 5. Accordingly, the Registry is directed to restore Criminal Revision No.1388/2019, (Smt. Vijyeta Swarnkar vs. Pradip Kumar and others) in its original number. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Ravi Mandavi