BAHADUR SINGH SAINI v. KAMAL KISHORE YADAV AND ANR
COCP/1874/2024 · 2025-01-09
Harkesh Manuja
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 53536 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 53536 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
COCP No.1874 of 202
IN TH 271
BAHADUR SING
KAMAL KISHO
CORAM: HON'
Present: Mr.
for th
Mr. G
HARKESH MAN
1.
Lear
order passed by t passed in CM No.
2.
In vi the present petiti petition, subject t in RA-CW No.40
3.
Dism
4.
Rule
January 09, 202 Atik Whe Whe 2024 (O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR
COCP No.
Date of De SINGH SAINI
Vs ISHORE YADAV AND ANR
ON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH Mr. Sunil Kumar Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Addl. A.G., Punj
**** MANUJA, J. (Oral) Learned State counsel representing d by the Writ Court has been stayed M No.15716-CWP-2024 in RA-CW N In view of the above, learned counse petition at this stage, however, see bject to final outcome of the aforemen No.401 of 2024. Dismissed as not pressed with the afo Rule stands discharged.
(HA , 2025
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/N Whether reportable
Yes/N
UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH P No.1874 of 2024 (O&M) of Decision: 09.01.2025
......Petitioner
....Respondents ESH MANUJA ocate ., Punjab. nting the respondents informs that th stayed vide its order dated 26.09.202 CW No.401 of 2024. counsel for the petitioner does not pre er, seeks liberty to revive the prese rementioned CM No.15716-CWP-202 the aforesaid liberty.
(HARKESH MANUJA)
JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No
1 that the .2024 ot press present 2024 MOHMED ATIK 2025.01.10 09:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment