Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53536 (PNJ)

BAHADUR SINGH SAINI v. KAMAL KISHORE YADAV AND ANR

COCP/1874/2024 · 2025-01-09

Harkesh Manuja

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

COCP No.1874 of 202 IN TH 271 BAHADUR SING KAMAL KISHO CORAM: HON' Present: Mr. for th Mr. G HARKESH MAN 1. Lear order passed by t passed in CM No. 2. In vi the present petiti petition, subject t in RA-CW No.40 3. Dism 4. Rule January 09, 202 Atik Whe Whe 2024 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No. Date of De SINGH SAINI Vs ISHORE YADAV AND ANR ON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH Mr. Sunil Kumar Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Addl. A.G., Punj **** MANUJA, J. (Oral) Learned State counsel representing d by the Writ Court has been stayed M No.15716-CWP-2024 in RA-CW N In view of the above, learned counse petition at this stage, however, see bject to final outcome of the aforemen No.401 of 2024. Dismissed as not pressed with the afo Rule stands discharged. (HA , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/N Whether reportable Yes/N UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH P No.1874 of 2024 (O&M) of Decision: 09.01.2025 ......Petitioner ....Respondents ESH MANUJA ocate ., Punjab. nting the respondents informs that th stayed vide its order dated 26.09.202 CW No.401 of 2024. counsel for the petitioner does not pre er, seeks liberty to revive the prese rementioned CM No.15716-CWP-202 the aforesaid liberty. (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 1 that the .2024 ot press present 2024 MOHMED ATIK 2025.01.10 09:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment