Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53536 (PAT)

Dadan Yadav v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./41116/2025 · 2025-07-09

Ramesh Chand Malviya

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41116 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-69 Year-2025 Thana- SATHI District- West Champaran ====================================================== Dadan Yadav S/O Late Maharaj Yadav Resident of village- Khajuria, PS- Sathi, District- West champaran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ajeet Kumar Bhawdwaj For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Abhay Kumar Roy ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 2 09-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Sathi P.S Case No. 69 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(3), 191(2), 190, 117, 118(1), 115(2), 109(1), 352, 351(2) of B.N.S 3. As per prosecution case, petitioner along with co- accused variously armed have assaulted the informant. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is next submitted that allegation against the petitioner is general and omnibus in nature. It is further submitted that there is delay of near about 2 months in lodging of the complaint-cum-First Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41116 of 2025(2) dt.09-07-2025 2/2 Information Report. It is further submitted that petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as stated in paragraph 3 of the bail petition. It is also submitted that petitioner is in judicial custody since 30.04.2025. 5. However, learned APP for the State oppose the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner. 6. On perusal of the FIR and impugned order, it appears that allegation against the petitioner is to have assaulted on the hand of the informant by means of lathi. Injuries sustained by the informant is not grievous in nature and weapon used is also not sharp. 7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, nature of injuries and nature of weapon used in occurrence and submissions made on behalf of the petitioner, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M-1st, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Sathi P.S Case No. 69 of 2025. Mayank/- (Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) U T