1 2025:CGHC:51693 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5456 of 2025 Stayanarayan Agrawal S/o Late Puranmal Agrawal Aged About 70 Years R/o H.No. 155, Ward No. 12, Rawatpara, Kharora, Teh. Kharora, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Collector Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Sub Divisional Officer Tilda Nevara, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Tehsildar Kharora, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Revenue Inspector Kharora, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 6 - Revenue Inspector Bangoli, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 7 - Moh. Rafique S/o Abdul Razzak R/o Village Kharora, Tehsil Kharora, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 8 - Moh. Salim S/o Abdul Razzak R/o Village Kharora, Tehsil Kharora, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 9 - Shabina Bano W/o Moh. Iqbal R/o Village Kharora, Tehsil Kharora, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner : Mr. Ankur Agrawal, Advocate For Respondent-State : Mr. Soumitra Kesharwani, PL ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 Hon'ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Order on Board 16.10.2025 1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition with following reliefs: “10.1 A writ and/or an order in the nature of writ of mandamus do issue calling the relevant records from the court below pertaining to the case of the petitioner for its kind perusal; 10.2 A writ and/or an order in the nature of appropriate writ do issue direction to the respondent authorities to comply with the order dated 14.06.2023 passed by the respondent no.3 and memo dated 28.08.2024 issued by the respondent no.4 and complete the proceedings of revenue case no.202404114600038/B-121/year 2022-23 within specific time. 10.3 A writ and/or an order in the nature of appropriate writ do issue direction to the respondent authorities to expeditiously comply with the order dated 14.06.2023 passed in favour of the petitioner which is pending before the respondent authorities. 10.4 Cost of the proceedings. 10.5 Any other writs and directions that may be deemed fit and just in the facts & circumstances of the case.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that petitioner has filed an application before respondent No.4 for correction of map, which was previously dismissed on 24.11.2020 by respondent 3 No.4, against which, petitioner has preferred an appeal before respondent No.3, to which, on 14.06.2023 respondent No.3 has quashed the order dated 24.11.2020 and directed to mark the map (Nakshabatankan) as per the legal way. Thereafter, on 28.08.2024, respondent no.4 issued memo to the respondent nos.5 & 6 to conduct the survey as per by comparing the documents and record available, but till date, no action has been taken by the respondent nos.5 & 6 for complying with the order/memo. Learned Counsel further contended that there is no appeal filed by the private respondents and there is no any stay order passed by any of the Authority against the order dated 14.06.2023 respondent No.3. Hence, petitioner has came-up before this Court with aforementioned prayer. 3. Learned State Counsel contended that respondent Nos.5 & 6 bound by order of respondent no.4/Tahsildar with regard to correction of map of Khasra No.477/22 including Khasra Nos.482/4; Khasra No. 477/76 including Khasra No.482/4 situated at village Keshla, PH No.48, Tahsil Kharora, Distt- Raipur, (CG). 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the writ petition. 5. Vide order dated 27.08.2024, respondent/Tahsildar has passed the following order/direction: “……. आपቈ䢌कቔ咋गण ቛ宋र〾 ्䵚स㡍ቔ咋ቔ咋 आव㕇दन क व㔿व㕇रぁ्䵍 ज᱋ आपቈ䢌 ्䵚स㡍ቔ咋ቔ咋 क गई ह㥈 उसक सम⹁चᨿ!ቔ咋 सनव㕇ई म⹁नन"य अप"ल㉀"य न⡍ययल㉀य ቛ宋र〾 कर〾 ल㉀" गई ह㥈 और〾 म⹁नन"य अप"ल㉀"य न⡍ययल㉀य क उकᕍቔ咋 आदश क व㔿व㕇रぁ्䵍 4 कई ्䵝गन य अ+ቔ咋र〿र〾म⹁ आदश पर〿र〾ቔ咋 नह㥈- व㔿कय गय ह㥈। और〾 व㕇ह㥈 आदश अ+व㔿ቔ咋म⹁ स㡍व㕇रぁप ्䵚प⩍ቔ咋 कर〾 !क ह㥈। अቔ咋0 आपቈ䢌कቔ咋गण क आपቈ䢌 व㔿नर〾ध✾र〾 ह㥈न स व㔿नर〾स㡍ቔ咋 व㔿कय ज᱋ቔ咋 ह㥈। अप"ल㉀"य न⡍ययल㉀य क आदश क पर〿र〾पल㉀न ह㥈ቔ咋 व㕇द भⵂ3म⸿म⹁ क नቋ䮋 बा㸡+कन प3व㕇व㕇ቔ咋8 व㔿कय ज᱋न क आदश पर〿र〾ቔ咋 व㔿कय ज᱋ቔ咋 ह㥈 ቔ咋थ┾ पन0 उभⵂयपኘ顎; क उपቝ嶌्䵝व㔿ቔ咋 म⹁= प3व㕇 एव㕇+ व㕇ቔ咋म⹁न प+ज᱋"यन अቈ䢌भⵂल㉀ख एव㕇+ अन⡍य दस㡍ቔ咋व㕇ज᱋; स म⸿म⹁ल㉀न कर〾ቔ咋 ह㥁ए अपन ्䵢्䵖 अቈ䢌भⵂम⹁ቔ咋 क सथ┾ नቋ䮋 बा㸡+कन ह㥈ቔ咋 ्䵚स㡍ቔ咋व㔿व㕇ቔ咋 ्䵚व㔿ቔ咋व㕇दन ्䵚स㡍ቔ咋ቔ咋 व㔿कय tkus ckcr~ nks jktLo व㔿नर〾"ኘ顎क; एव㕇+ द पा㸡व㕇र〿र〾य; क ा㸡Dम⹁ गठ‿Fቔ咋 कर〾 ሺ㪋पन ज᱋र〾" कय ज᱋व㕇" 6. Considering facts of the case, nature of reliefs, submissions of counsel for the parties, writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent No.4/Tahsidar to comply with order dated 27.08.2024 passed by itself in Revenue Case no.202404114600038/B-121/year 2022-23 and conclude the proceeding strictly in accordance with relevant rules/law/regulation, after giving sufficient/proper opportunity of hearing to private respondent Nos.7 to 9 and in their presence, preferably within an outer limit of 120 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order, subject to verification if there is no stay. 7. However, it is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. CC as per rules. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge J/-