Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53526 (PNJ)

NAREEB v. ASIMA BRAR IAS AND ANOTHER

COCP/2309/2025 · 2025-05-12

Nidhi Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 113 Nareeb Asima Brar IAS, Managing Nigam Ltd. and another CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) proceedings order dated of this Court in CWP Nigam Limited and another”, vide which the respondents were directed “…to ensure that, the petitioner’s representation is decided within six week has been passed on the representation of the petitioner. direction issued to the respondents was that “ COCP-2309-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.2309 of 2025 Date of decision : Versus Asima Brar IAS, Managing Director, Haryana Vidyut Nigam Ltd. and another CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Sunil K. Tandon, Advocate (through VC) for the petitioner. Mr. Ankit Rana, Advocate for Ms. Vasundhara Asija Bhandari, Advocate for the respondents-DHVBN. NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that proceedings be initiated against the respondent order dated 15.1.2025 (Annexure P-1) passed by a co of this Court in CWP-762-2025 titled as “ Nigam Limited and another”, vide which the respondents were “…to ensure that, the petitioner’s representation is decided within six weeks’ from today.” It is submitted that no speaking order has been passed on the representation of the petitioner. Heard. Perusal of the order dated 15.1.2025 direction issued to the respondents was that “ 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2309 of 2025 (O & M) Date of decision :-12.05.2025 …..Petitioner Director, Haryana Vidyut Prasaran …..Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Sunil K. Tandon, Advocate (through VC) Mr. Ankit Rana, Advocate for Ms. Vasundhara Asija Bhandari, Advocate DHVBN. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that contempt against the respondents for not complying the 1) passed by a co-ordinate Bench titled as “Haryana Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Limited and another”, vide which the respondents were “…to ensure that, the petitioner’s representation is decided It is submitted that no speaking order has been passed on the representation of the petitioner. dated 15.1.2025 shows that the only direction issued to the respondents was that “the petitioner’s VIJAY ASIJA 2025.05.13 18.38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document application policy adopted by the respondents petitioner’s representation is decided within six weeks’ from today pursuance received compensation of Rs.16,89,545/ respondents. It is the grievance of the petitioner that order has been passed also submits that even no interest has been granted to the petitioner on the compensation amount. out against the respondents. Hence, the present petition stands dismissed May 12, 202 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No COCP-2309-2025 application would be decided expeditiously in accordance with the policy adopted by the respondents….” petitioner’s representation is decided within six weeks’ from today It is admitted by learned counsel for nce of the order 15.1.2025 (Annexure P compensation of Rs.16,89,545/- respondents. It is the grievance of the petitioner that order has been passed. At this stage learned counsel f also submits that even no interest has been granted to the petitioner on the compensation amount. In view of the above admitted out against the respondents. Hence, the present petition stands dismissed. Rule stand discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 2 would be decided expeditiously in accordance with the and “…to ensure that the petitioner’s representation is decided within six weeks’ from today.” It is admitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that in the order 15.1.2025 (Annexure P-1), the petitioner has in terms of the policy of the respondents. It is the grievance of the petitioner that no speaking . At this stage learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that even no interest has been granted to the petitioner on admitted facts, no contempt is made out against the respondents. Hence, the present petition stands Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.05.13 18.38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document