APHC010435922024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3886/2024 Between: 1. TUMMALA KOTESWARA RAO,, S/O RAMAMOHANA RAO AGED 60 YEARS, OCC RECORD ASSISTANT R/O KOSURU VILLAGE, MOVVA MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, S/O NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, WORKING AS SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE (HR IV-FR AND LR), SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI KONA SASIDHAR, S/O SRI SANTHA RAO, WORKING AS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. SRI R NARASIMHA RAO, S/O SRI R. ANJANEYULU, WORKING AS SECRETARY, ANDHRA PRADESH RESIDENTIAL EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION SOCIETY, 4TH FLOOR, VIDYA BHAVAN, VENKATADRI TOWERS, ATMAKUR VILLAGE, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. SRI DAMACHARLA MADHUSUDHANA RAO, S/O D. SOMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, WORKING AS THE PRINCIPAL, N.L.V.R.G.S.R.V. SCHOOL, (AP RESIDENTIAL SCHOOL), NIMMAKURU, KRISHNA DISTRICT - 521158. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondent for his willful disobedience of Interim Order Dt. 23.07.2024 passed in I.A.No.1 of 2024 in W.P No. 15664 of 2024 on the file of this Hon'ble Court Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SRINIVAS AMBATI Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. G RAJU 2. NOOKA JAGANNADHAM 3. RAMA CHANDRA RAO GURRAM The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: The above contempt case is filed complaining the violation of the order dated 23.07.2024 passed in I.A.No.1 of 2024 in W.P.No.15664 of 2024. 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, Sri Subbarao, learned counsel representing Sri Srinivas Ambati, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that since the main writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn, no further adjudication is required in the contempt case. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 28.11.2025 TVN 378 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE No.3886 OF 2024 Date: 28.11.2025 TVN