Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53516 (ALL)

X MINOR v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

CRLR/5156/2023 · 2025-01-24

Samit Gopal

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:12857 Court No. - 78 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 5156 of 2023 Revisionist :- X Minor Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Pankaj Kumar Mishra,Ravi Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- Ajay Kumar Pathak,G.A. Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J. 1. List revised. No one appears on behalf of the revisionist to press this revision for bail despite the fact that there are two learned counsels appearing on behalf of the revisionist. Sri Ajay Kumar Pathak, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 is also not present even when the matter has been taken up in the revised list. Sri V.D. Ojha, learned counsel for the State is present. 2. The present revision has been filed by the revisionist with the prayer to set-aside the judgement and order dated 19.8.2023 passed by Addl. Sessions Judge/Special Judge (POCSO Act) Ist, District Hathras in Criminal Appeal no.17 of 2023 and impugned order dated 23.1.2023 passed by Juvenile Justice Board, Hathras in Case Crime No.14 of 2007, u/s 376 IPC, P.S. Sikandarau, District Hathras. 3. Since there is no representation on behalf of the revisionist despite the matter being taken up in the revised list, the present revision for bail is dismissed for want of prosecution. 4. The present revision consigned to records. (Samit Gopal, J.) Order Date :- 24.1.2025 Gaurav Kuls Digitally signed by :- GAURAV KULSHRESTHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad