1 / 2 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR FA No. 158 of 2019 • Rajesh Kumar S/o Balaram Verma Aged About 33 Years R/o Village Mohra, Post Mohra, Tehsil Simga, District Balodabazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh. --- Appellant/ Plaintiff versus 1. Anita Verma Wd/o Late Neelkant Verma Aged About 42 Years R/o Village Mohra, Post Mohra, Tehsil Simga, District Balodabazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh. 2. Rajeev Kumar @ Sonaram S/o Late Neelkant Verma Aged About 22 Years R/o Village Mohra, Post Mohra, Tehsil Simga, District Balodabazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh. 3. Baby Kumari @ Jyoti D/o Late Neelkant Verma Aged About 26 Years R/o Village Mohra, Post Mohra, Tehsil Simga, District Balodabazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh. 4. Neelam Kumari D/o Late Neelkant Verma Aged About 24 Years R/o Village Mohra, Post Mohra, Tehsil Simga, District Balodabazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh. 5. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector Balodabazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh. ---Respondents/ Non-applicants ____________________________________________________________ For Appellant : Mr. Rajendra Kumar, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Shobhit Koshta, Advocate For Resp. No. 1 to 4 : Mr. Somnath Verma, Advocate For Resp. State. : Mr. Kalpesh Ruparel, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order On Board 16/10/2025 1. Learned counsel for appellant submits that they are having no instruction and therefore this Court issued fixed date SPC vide order dated 30.07.2025 to PAWAN KUMAR JHA Digitally signed by PAWAN KUMAR JHA 2 / 2 appellant for his appearance before this Court. He also contended that till now they are having no instruction. 2. The SPC issued by this Court for appearance of appellant is reported to be served upon him on 23.08.2025, however, again there is no representation on his behalf. 3. In the aforementioned facts of the case, this court is left with no other option but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 4. Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge pwn